Money quote IMHO.
It is a good quote, but I would ask something of our legal beagles here. Obama has chosen not to play, as per the letter to Beck and the Defendant's follow-through of not showing up at the hearing. Rumor has it Defendant will want to become Plaintiff against the GA SoS's anticipated ruling. My strong guess is that Team Obama will expect not to have to produce the documentation demanded by Malihi's subpoena, while still being heard on his anticipated complaint against Beck.
What's the legal connection between the evidence submitted to Malihi and the anticipated action from Obama against Beck? Is the new process all de novo such that the judge in an Obama -> Beck complaint may not give such evidence any legal weight, or could that judge (even) look at the evidence, irrespective of Beck's entering it into evidence? Would Beck first have to enter it into evidence? Surely Beck could choose to enter such evidence and counter-sue!
Couldn't Beck counter-sue for Obama's production of materials central to Beck's job that by that time he will have had to rule upon sans Soetoro's cooperation? I would think the judge would be very inclined to renew Malihi's subpoena (perhaps loading it even more production demands, irrespective of whether Obama continued or tried to vacate his intiated action. Could he do that? I would think this will be reflected in dozens of states, especially if their courts have official access to the Malihi's courts entered evidence.
If such actions were to take place, I would think Obama's relationship with all the courts and all the states that in any way have provision to confirm his eligibility would immediately grind to a halt. Apuzzo indicated SCOTUS would officially know of the record of Malihi's 1/26 hearing. Can all other states become officially aware, and give it "full faith and credit" that the Fogblowers so gleefully wanted HIDOH (LF)BCs to be given?
If so, such a stalemate could at least move forward at the level of all the states (without recourse for lack of Obama's standing in Federal Court(s)) for the states' confirmation (or not) of his eligibility, any continuation on his part would surely be met with demands for his resignation. State courts could put warrants out for his arrest, e.g., Arpaio, for contempt of their courts any time Obama might enter their state.
Barry might well make some Constitution-burying move that would force the House to impeach him. In case the Senate didn't convict, one could easily imagine some ruse for martial law being imposed and Obama attempting to take over all government functions unto the executive. That circumstance obviously wouldn't fly with scores of millions of patriots who would make reference to a Constitutional charge "to alter or abolish," with the situation likely "going hot" in less than 60 seconds.
HF