Valid? The judge would be lacking sense to accept or view these Internet pictures of dubious origins as 'true copies' and certianly not certified documents as true from any issuing authority.
I didn't say I thought he would but you and I have not really seen the record in this proceeding so we don't know what else there is. Or, I see, you are even addressing my proposition of the basis on which he admitted them--well I guess as to that we don't know.
They are printouts of digitally generated fakes--I don't suppose I know what words he might have used. But he let them in.
Point is that they are in the record but that doesn't demonstrate, absent supporting evidence, that they prove anything other than that someone created them.