Replies

It can be called, rationalizing, slippery slope, or "situation ethics". It is hard to take and defend a position, if you have a contradictory dog in the game somewhere else. For what I have known about FreeRepublic for my 12 years here so far is that it has been extremely, almost 80-90% anti-illegal immigration, pro-deportation (either systemized, or auto-deport based on cutting off the "bennies"), no automatic US citizenship for anchor babies, fedgov money crackdown on sanctuary cities, English Only in Government, no drivers license for illegals, no in-state tuition breaks for illegals, photo voter ID to discourge illegals from voting, increased local enforcement, detention-on-the-spot and cooperation with I.C.E., like through 287(g), more state-level power returned as in in Alabama, Oklahoma, Arizona and Georgia, employer sanctions, and hermetically sealed border first and foremost. To find the candidate who will adhere to that, and there are those out there, is the challenge. I would start by saying for 2012 we need to make sure every GOP we nominate for house and senate shares these values, and if they don't they be ousted in the primary. Then we need to oust each and every Democrat who does not adhere to these values, who votes in favor of continued Aztlan-ization, and the corruption of the American political system and demographics through rampant, sanctioned illegal immigration which translates into a massive, future, Democrat Party entitlement-consituency vote bank to keep the in power for the next 500 years.