Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanInTokyo; HiTech RedNeck; Norm Lenhart; GVnana; zeestephen; David Isaac; onyx; livius; ...

Below is the key provision in Newt’s proposal to let in illegals.
............

Congress must charge the Department of Justice to establish a “citizens’ review” process for those here outside the law. It would establish committees to process these cases in individual communities and determine who will continue on this path to legality, and who will be sent home. Congress must define understandable, clear, objective legal standards that will be applied equally during this process.

.............
This is the key language where the USA would get screwed. The problem here is not that Congress would set out clear guidelines—rather the problem is that local would have the ultimate AUTHORITY to determine “who will continue on this path to legality”.

It absolutely does NOT matter what guideline the Congress lays down. It will be obeyed to the letter in American counties. But in counties that have heavy illegal populations —distant congressional directives will be totally IGNORED. These counties will let in EVERYONE—especially from countries of the county’s dominant ethnic group. These counties will become counties that attract illegals from all over the USA. Further these counties will attract and give entry to illegals from all over the world.

If you don’t get this then study what happened to the Reagan law that was passed in 1986. The border enforcement part of the law was totally ignored and the Mexicans saw the law as a surrender and began to pour over the border.


58 posted on 01/26/2012 2:21:31 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ckilmer

Excellent points.

If a written law is not enforced, then what’s the point of the law?

If the Constitution can be whimsically interpreted by any federal judge, then what’s the point of a Constitution?


59 posted on 01/26/2012 2:38:44 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

And voila, lots of Nuevo Mexico Cities and the like.

It would be ugly. Ghettos.

If there is a bright side of it, the ghettos concentrating the “ex illegales” in a few small spots will reduce their electoral impact versus spreading out.

But I think Congress is going to barf at the idea of these ghettos. And as now, nothing will be done.


60 posted on 01/26/2012 2:47:39 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

I think you’re right.

I don’t think we have an alternative, candidate-wise, but we sure as shootin’ could be raising a bigger ruckus about this than we are.

As it is, we are sending the message, as I hear so often hear, that conservatives simply “don’t care” about anything except beating Obama.

I totally want to defeat Obama. But there’s more that needs to be done.


62 posted on 01/26/2012 3:10:35 PM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

hear = here

Sorry.

Ugh.


63 posted on 01/26/2012 3:11:17 PM PST by fightinJAG (So many seem to have lost their sense of smell . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

Exactly, we don’t need new laws to address the illegal immigration problem, we simply need to enforce the laws we already have. Newt is being dishonest.


66 posted on 01/26/2012 4:00:15 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson