Thanks, Plummz.
"It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here—a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country. The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth there; the President made documents available to the general public by placing them on his website."
Notice the parsing of words? "The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth (whose?) there." Notice that Jablonski says very carefully that the pResident made "documents" available. Nowhere in this statement does Jablonski say that the "documents" made available are the same as what the State of Hawaii produced, even though he (Jablonski) disingenuinely tries to suggest such, by surrounding the statement with references to the Full Faith and Credit language. Busted!
Thanks, Plummz.
all depends on what the meaning of “documents” is.
So if he has them to put on whitehouse.gov, why not just turn them in to the court?
That’s the worst about all of this. How many of us would be allowed to hand a court a URL scan as evidence?