Isn't that a law in physics? Nasties attract Nasties....
I’d need to see the DNA to figure out what is going on in that photo.
This is a Class 5 Mullet Violation if I ever saw one.
I don’t wish gay on anyone, and I believe the reason why there’s an argument in the first place is that the gay lobby crushes any attempt at medical scientific inquiry on the topic.
This is the first place I go in any argument about gay rights -
“What causes it? You want me to get behind it as normative. I know that at the very least you have a reproductive disorder probably along the same lines as post-partum depression, in that you can’t conceive normally through any other means but adoption. As such, aren’t you even curious WHY you don’t feel like you had a choice?”
To go further, now you want me to afford legal rights to you in your relationship, and in the benefits it is going to afford the rest of society. The only justification you offer is that of ‘equality’, when clearly there’s nothing equal about this sort of family structure at all.
Is it reasonable for us, prior to doing such a thing, to ask for some research first? Isn’t this the reason why we nearly wrecked our economy to stop global warming too? We nearly placed massive limits on individual civil liberties on the basis of very poor research and a massive amount of emotional outpouring of support.
I think this approach does a couple of things. First, it doesn’t bring ideology into it in the least. This means that I’m not intimating that a gay person is either wrong, or that their condition was a choice. I know enough gay people to know that many do not feel they had one any more than many pedophiles do, for example.
Second, if we don’t know what causes it, we don’t know that there may not be a cure, and whether they think they need one or not, they should at least offer other gay people the choice of being cured or not before we go tearing up 6000 years of social fabric first.
I want to see the ORIGINAL parts list.