Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oh no, she said she chose to be gay
Charleston (WV) Daily Mail ^ | January 24, 2012 | Don Surber

Posted on 01/24/2012 12:27:38 PM PST by Mustang Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: Mustang Driver

21 posted on 01/24/2012 12:56:58 PM PST by Albion Wilde (A land of hyper-legalisms is not the same as a land of law. --Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado

Now that is HILARIOUS!


22 posted on 01/24/2012 12:59:58 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

She left him. He didn’t leave her.


23 posted on 01/24/2012 1:01:18 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver
Of course homosexuality is a choice. The problem is that most everybody fails to understand what is meant by "choice" in that observation.
24 posted on 01/24/2012 1:01:41 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry

dueling skanks


25 posted on 01/24/2012 1:01:47 PM PST by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver
Possibly, but something innate is at work here:


26 posted on 01/24/2012 1:02:57 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry

Since the two of them look vaguely similar, I'm guessing there was some kind of wicked Uncle Ernie in her childhood.

27 posted on 01/24/2012 1:03:03 PM PST by Albion Wilde (A land of hyper-legalisms is not the same as a land of law. --Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver
My nephew, who's a Hollywood producer, put it this way:

"Any recent lead actor/actress who has been in a hot series for four years or more is set for life. He never has to work again. His children will never have to work. They are free to do and be what they want, despite the cost, despite the controversy."

28 posted on 01/24/2012 1:04:38 PM PST by pabianice (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

I think they make a lovely couple, can we assume the one with the tie wears the snap-on tools?


29 posted on 01/24/2012 1:08:50 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver

If having SSAD (same sex attraction disorder) were a defect in human DNA it would be safe to say it would have been bred out of the genetic code in a few generations as up until doctors started playing with artificial means, the SSAD crowd could not reproduce.

Even if a case could be made that they “feel” this way SO WHAT? There are many feelings we as civilized humans just do not act upon unless we are part of the liberal “if it feels good do it” movement.

When I see a car that I would really like, if I used the SSAD mentality it should be OK to just steal it.

Or how about if I spot a hot chick that I would like to do the nasty with, according to the SSAD crowd I should just do a Denny Crane and throw her down on the floor and do her!


30 posted on 01/24/2012 1:09:29 PM PST by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry
Heyyyy!!!! Waiiiittttt a minute. I recognize that red hair. Ain't that the newest Kennedy (left) that plans to run for a Senate seat from Massachusetts?


31 posted on 01/24/2012 1:11:54 PM PST by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver

The two sides on the issue are lesbians say it is a choice, the males say that it is genetic.

During the 90s the argument between the two homosexual factions was pretty open.


32 posted on 01/24/2012 1:12:15 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Ok, I’ll bite...what is meant by “choice” in that observation? I have no idea what your comment meant.


33 posted on 01/24/2012 1:13:24 PM PST by LivingNet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry

I just bet their momma’s are so proud....


34 posted on 01/24/2012 1:14:39 PM PST by southernindymom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: avacado
"I dunno... in some instances they are born that way... case in point... "

Obama has the proud distinction of being a "bi-bi"...

A bi-racial bi-sexual.

35 posted on 01/24/2012 1:15:48 PM PST by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

This is a Class 5 Mullet Violation if I ever saw one.

I don’t wish gay on anyone, and I believe the reason why there’s an argument in the first place is that the gay lobby crushes any attempt at medical scientific inquiry on the topic.

This is the first place I go in any argument about gay rights -

“What causes it? You want me to get behind it as normative. I know that at the very least you have a reproductive disorder probably along the same lines as post-partum depression, in that you can’t conceive normally through any other means but adoption. As such, aren’t you even curious WHY you don’t feel like you had a choice?”

To go further, now you want me to afford legal rights to you in your relationship, and in the benefits it is going to afford the rest of society. The only justification you offer is that of ‘equality’, when clearly there’s nothing equal about this sort of family structure at all.

Is it reasonable for us, prior to doing such a thing, to ask for some research first? Isn’t this the reason why we nearly wrecked our economy to stop global warming too? We nearly placed massive limits on individual civil liberties on the basis of very poor research and a massive amount of emotional outpouring of support.

I think this approach does a couple of things. First, it doesn’t bring ideology into it in the least. This means that I’m not intimating that a gay person is either wrong, or that their condition was a choice. I know enough gay people to know that many do not feel they had one any more than many pedophiles do, for example.

Second, if we don’t know what causes it, we don’t know that there may not be a cure, and whether they think they need one or not, they should at least offer other gay people the choice of being cured or not before we go tearing up 6000 years of social fabric first.


36 posted on 01/24/2012 1:15:48 PM PST by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar
Oh nooooo. I dropped my frankfurter!!!


37 posted on 01/24/2012 1:16:01 PM PST by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver

The bigotry of the Liberal mind never fails to show its ugly face, even when addressing the personal beliefs of someone who is nominally “on their side”.

The dominant media treatment of Nixon is likely to be no different than their treatment of black Conservatives - they feel betrayed.

But the only thing being betrayed is the belief-myths in their own mind - that everything is as they believe it to be, when the reality is not as they believe.


38 posted on 01/24/2012 1:19:12 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs; dragonblustar
Dating a lesbian that looks like a male is like wanting a hotdog but only getting the bun.

Oh nooooo. I dropped my frankfurter!!!

Good God, there are just so many damn funny FReepers here. This place is a treasure. LOL!
39 posted on 01/24/2012 1:23:22 PM PST by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Exactly, if you’re “born that way” with a propensity to steal, covet, lust, murder, blaspheme, idolize, etc...

you’re still held accountable for each violation,
unless you have Someone that can pay for those sins for you.


40 posted on 01/24/2012 1:23:22 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson