Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehring

The NRA backed this? I guess it is another of their “give a little to get a little” excuses. Who the hell is running the NRA anyhow? Did I see Paul Ryan’s name on this legislation?


7 posted on 01/23/2012 2:44:06 PM PST by Jukeman (God help us for we are deep in trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jukeman

another no read comment?


9 posted on 01/23/2012 2:49:33 PM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Jukeman
I believe this relieved an unfair practice that of making firearms manufactures pay the tax every two weeks. They now pay them like every other manufacturer quarterly. It is not a new or increased tax but it should save a little cash for those manufacturers.
10 posted on 01/23/2012 2:49:53 PM PST by 95B30 ( The Professional Left: "Their morals are crooked, their take logic is flawed, their honor is stolen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Jukeman

It didn’t impose a new tax, it changed when they had to send in the money, to make it the same as other excise tax collections.

I’m guessing there is some sort of interest rate involved, such that by waiting 3 months the government gets a little extra money, but 4 million over 10 years is a rather small amount of extra money.

And I’d guess Ron Paul opposed it because he probably opposes having ANY excise tax, and therefore wouldn’t vote to change the date of collection because that would implicitly accept the notion of an excise tax. It’s how he thinks, and so long as it makes no difference in passing a bill, he has that luxury. If he had actually caused this fix to fail, I would bet he wouldn’t have voted this way.

I say that because he voted to oppose the payroll tax holiday when it didn’t matter, but when his lone objection would have stopped them from passing it last Christmas, he pointedly stayed out of town rather than making that objection.


13 posted on 01/23/2012 2:52:49 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Jukeman

Jukeman, did you read he article? This is a very good thing for ammo manufacturers and I would have been shocked if the NRA had not backed it.

Think of it this way. If you are self employed you must make quarterly estimated income tax deposits. Ammo manufactures that have had to make excise tax deposits every other week will now only have to make them quarterly like most other taxes.


15 posted on 01/23/2012 2:55:14 PM PST by Tomhorn (Wake up and smell the coffee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Jukeman

I’ve done it too. But you got to read the article before typing. :o)


17 posted on 01/23/2012 2:57:19 PM PST by Tenacious 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Jukeman
The NRA backed this? I guess it is another of their “give a little to get a little” excuses. Who the hell is running the NRA anyhow? Did I see Paul Ryan’s name on this legislation?

Did you even read the article and find out what the bill does? Are you so stupid you can't see this is a good thing for ammo manufacturers?

24 posted on 01/23/2012 3:20:47 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson