Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Astronaut

Yes, just like the protracted battle between Clinton and Obama did so much to help McCain in 2008. Having the primary decided before 95% of he country has any input is much worse than a primary running strong for a cople months through super Tuesday.


4 posted on 01/22/2012 8:24:01 PM PST by ilgipper (Everything you get from the government was taken from someone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ilgipper

The good part(if there is one) is they are using up Obama’s ammunition.

By the time either of them runs against Obama the world will have heard everything Obama could use against them.


25 posted on 01/22/2012 8:38:11 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ilgipper

You’re right. A hard-fought battle in the primaries is a tonic for the eventual nominee, unless he’s a sitting president. (See Carter and Ted Kennedy, or Bush and Buchanan for the latter.)


65 posted on 01/22/2012 10:48:44 PM PST by Dick Holmes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ilgipper

Meanwhile the federal courts keep sliding the Texas primary back over redistricting. Latest schedule is April 8. The largest conservative block of votes and we don’t even get a say in who the candidate will be. Lets go back to smoke filled rooms, At least we generally got competent, rather than glib and/or good looking candidates.


70 posted on 01/23/2012 12:09:57 AM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson