To: onyx
Right, because we wouldn’t possibly support a non-perfect candidate in order to stop Romney.
You can rationally argue Gingrich as the best way to stop Romney. Don’t try to sell Gingrich as the best conservative candidate.
BTW, I don’t think Gingrich is for open borders, but that’s because “open borders” is a misnomer many people use when they mean “soft on illegals in the country”.
To: CharlesWayneCT
You can rationally argue Gingrich as the best way to stop Romney. Dont try to sell Gingrich as the best conservative candidate.Gingrich is the best conservative candidate by far and he has the record and experience to prove it!
You really don't want to argue against Gingrich.
30 posted on
01/22/2012 2:31:35 PM PST by
onyx
(PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
To: CharlesWayneCT
You can rationally argue Gingrich as the best way to stop Romney. Dont try to sell Gingrich as the best conservative candidate.Gingrich is the best conservative candidate by far and he has the record and experience to prove it!
You really don't want to argue against Gingrich.
31 posted on
01/22/2012 2:32:00 PM PST by
onyx
(PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
To: CharlesWayneCT; onyx
You can rationally argue Gingrich as the best way to stop Romney. Dont try to sell Gingrich as the best conservative candidate.So who is, Paul?
Your post:
You can rationally argue Gingrich as the best way to stop Romney.Fruedian slip?
44 posted on
01/22/2012 4:02:41 PM PST by
Las Vegas Ron
(Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson