Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ExNewsExSpook
Paterno follwed the law in '02. The police could not have acted on second hand info. That's why PA law is set up the way it is. By reporting to the AD instead of police something could be done. Going to the police in '02 would have been even less effective because the police could not have acted on info from Paterno. It had to either come from McQueary who had first hand info or the proper authorities at Penn State. Like it or not, that's the law in PA.

Paterno is a convenient target but Sandusky is the accused perv. I think the fact that the police and DA did nothing in the '98 accusation may have played a role in '02.

56 posted on 01/22/2012 8:44:08 AM PST by NEPA (Give me liberty, not debt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: NEPA

Thank you for that post—well said


62 posted on 01/22/2012 9:02:07 AM PST by mom4kittys (See you in another life, brotha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: NEPA
If Paterno wanted something done in '98, 2002 about Sandusky or at any time about ANYTHING in State College it would be done; OR, if he DIDN'T want it done, it wouldn't. Ignore those facts and you enter the Twilight Zone...

And, RIP JoePa.

64 posted on 01/22/2012 9:04:10 AM PST by Pharmboy (She turned me into a Newt...but I got better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson