To: jennychase
Sarah Palin had nothing to do with it. Besides she didn't endorse him.
He won because of his last two debates.
101 posted on
01/21/2012 4:31:12 PM PST by
submarinerswife
(Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results~Einstein)
To: submarinerswife
111 posted on
01/21/2012 4:32:40 PM PST by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
To: submarinerswife; jennychase
Should Palin endorse him, consider the face on right NOW. Money would flow better and the public would awaken and pay attention.
She is who a large number of people would pay attention to. It would awaken and put life into the race. Welcome the possibility of that.
405 posted on
01/21/2012 5:44:11 PM PST by
JSteff
((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
To: submarinerswife
“Sarah Palin had nothing to do with it. Besides she didn’t endorse him.”
Well, she kinda sorta did in her usual kinda sorta way. But we’ll take it.
611 posted on
01/21/2012 7:29:57 PM PST by
ari-freedom
(If SOPA passes, we will lose our Free Republic.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson