“Jim has made his position PERFECTLY clear: FR will not be used to bash Newt. Period.”
The question being asked is what constitutes “bashing” and what constitutes “asking legitimate questions relating to the candidate’s positions on the issues?” Is it FR’s policy that the latter is also forbidden? It’s telling you’re unable to differentiate between the two though not surprising considering your vulgar responses.
Bashing is constantly using info that has been disproved, constantly posting it despite it being disproved, and constantly ignoring that it has been disproved.
Like a certain poster the other night that went three for three by posting not one but three outright lies in an effort to bash Newt.
[They were a Romney supporter if memory serves.]
“vulgar responses”
Typical. I get that from children like yourself. You don’t even know the definition of vulgar, you just don’t want to be held accountable for your own actions and anyone that does hurts your feelings. I couldn’t care less. Grow up.