I agree. IMHO Newty is the antithisis of conservative. It’s amazing to me how the newtbots simply pretend the Newty/Pelosi ad never happened. And they pretend he was not a serial philanderer who, in his last fling, lied and deceived for 18 months. Many of you may not believe he asked wife two for an open marriage. But I believe, given my 68 years life experience, it is consistent with his ego. Newty is not family friendly.
Also, I don’t get Jim Robinson’s claim Gingrich is not an elitist politician. Of course he is. And, IMHO, he shares reponsibility with a whole lot of people for the Marxist regime in Washington. Certainly he pursued some conservative agenda items as House Speaker. But he did not ever address the core problems: The Marxist cooption of unions, education, media, judiciary, religious ledership and Wall Street leadership. Newty sort of nibbled round the edges.
As for SC, where I reside, someone tell me why Bible Belt Christians would vote for this man. You Gingrichbots pretend that Santorum does not exist. As I drive around the Greenville area I see more Santorum signs than Gingrich signs. The situation here is not unlike Iowa for different reasons. Romney, Gingrich and the Marxist propaganda organs pretended Santorum did not exist there, too. But low and behold Santorum took Iowa. Now you Gingrichbots are desperately trying to pretend Santorum did not win. It really is pathetic.
My wife and I will be voting for Santorum this morning.
You forgot the courtesy ping...
“As for SC, where I reside, someone tell me why Bible Belt Christians would vote for this man.”
He’s not Mitt Romney and they think he can win. Of course this is the same logic that causes people to vote for Mitt, i.e. he’s not Obama and they think he can win. So, apparently, Newt is the not-not-Obama candidate.