Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich’s woman problem [I push leftist propaganda on FR and all I got was this zot]
Washington Post ^ | 01/20/2012 | Felicia Sonmez

Posted on 01/20/2012 1:40:13 PM PST by americanophile

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-250 next last
To: americanophile

Whew!! IBTZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


61 posted on 01/20/2012 2:25:49 PM PST by wizr (If God isn't on your side, who is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Marianne Gingrich has no moral high ground to stand on. She cheated with him on his first wife. Now she wants us to feel sorry for her? She thinks her opinion of his fitness to be President should count? Really?

I've also seen how being cheated on can make some folks become very bitter and a bit unbalanced; they can never seem to move on and can only see the other person as evil incarnate.

62 posted on 01/20/2012 2:25:49 PM PST by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady
Huh?

People are getting zotted now on FR for not liking Gingrich?

Not believing Gingrich can win the general is "leftist propoganda?

I wouldn't go so far as to say Gingrich couldn't win the general. However, I would not say people who believe such based on his womanizing are "leftist propogandists".

63 posted on 01/20/2012 2:27:37 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; TheOldLady

Hmmm. Interesting ZOT.

I see that americanophile was no fan of Gingrich in the primaries, but is that ZOT-worthy? I’m still wavering between Gingrich and Santorum for Saturday. If I decide Santorum is the better choice for me, do I get zotted, too?

I read through the first page of posting history. The only thing I saw on there that was really objectionable was a reference to how unfair it is for capital gains to be taxed at a lower rate. (Americanophile needs to understand that the invested money was already taxed ONCE as income, duh.)

Anyway, I actually LIKE to see articles like this on FR because it gives me good insight to the lefty mindset. Granted, you expect the BARF ALERT, but it’s clear that americanophile doesn’t think Gingrich is the right choice in the primary, and the woman problem is real.

Oh, well. I hope we haven’t devolved to a point where just because JimRob has endorsed we are all expected to fall in line a la 1984. I may still vote for Gingrich tomorrow. We’ll see. Gonna do a final side-by-side with Santorum tonight.


64 posted on 01/20/2012 2:30:55 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Peter from Rutland

Bachmann can bugger off, and good riddance.

As long as she continues to vote OK then she should try to stay in her Congressional seat, but she is not a national figure.

Our concern about her right now is whether she will endorse Mitt Romney after helping him so much, or will she try to regain some respect by endorsing Newt.


65 posted on 01/20/2012 2:31:02 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

These same women, in all likelyhood including the author of this piece,all voted for BJ Clinton. They did so after hearing from Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers and Juanita Broderick.
Hypocrites.

I don’t approve at all of what Newt has done, but allowing Obama four more years of power is much too dangerous for this country to worry about two affairs. (I’m female, btw.)
Everybody has flaws. This election, trite as it sounds, we must select the least of the evils. This time, that’s Newt.


66 posted on 01/20/2012 2:32:14 PM PST by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swampfox101
You mean like a common street thug and community organizer like Hussein Obama....?

Of course not. Obama's a bum.

We should do much better. We don't need another unsteady President.

That's why we need to beware of electing another based on speaking ability.

67 posted on 01/20/2012 2:33:01 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

68 posted on 01/20/2012 2:33:10 PM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

I do like the fact that Chuck has endorsed Newt.

Newt certainly has the endorsement momentum, it seems...


69 posted on 01/20/2012 2:35:21 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

I searched Bing images for “fractal” There was a wealth of images from which to choose. I got about ten from one web site. Have fun with it.


70 posted on 01/20/2012 2:36:22 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

The four running are all we have....!

Any of them can and will beat hussein handily. And, any and all of them will be far more steady that the community organizer.


71 posted on 01/20/2012 2:37:38 PM PST by swampfox101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: swampfox101
will be far more steady that the community organizer

Not sure about "far" more steady. I think we need REAL steady, not just steadier.

72 posted on 01/20/2012 2:40:19 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby
I read through the first page of posting history. The only thing I saw on there that was really objectionable

I read through the posting history too.

Seemed like a pretty patriotic poster. Certainly not a leftist propogandist.

Hmmm.

73 posted on 01/20/2012 2:45:07 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Peter from Rutland

Wrong. If women ‘liked’ bachmann, she would still be in the race.


74 posted on 01/20/2012 2:45:42 PM PST by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

Take a good long look at the Republican field with this in mind: Who is the one who can stand up to MSM and Democrat dirty tricks and scrutiny? I’ve done that, and for all his baggage, the answer is Newt among the remaining field.

Everyone has baggage. Everyone has issues we don’t like. No one is a shining star or ideal candidate. No one. I don’t like that. You don’t like that. But it’s the fact we have to deal with.

So, all things considered, the one thing we don’t need is a candidate who will pull punches, try to be nice and reasonable when the MSM and Democrats are tearing them apart because they have to “stay above it all”. Not this time. America is at stake, not just some election. America! And that means we need a candidate who won’t roll over but go for the gut.

If we lose, and it’s possible with any in the field at this time, I want to at least be able to say “We fought the good fight and didn’t cave”. And for me, that spells Gingrich.

As for the zot, I can’t speak to that. Wasn’t my decision, I had no input.


75 posted on 01/20/2012 2:46:32 PM PST by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

Have a good week-end gotta run...!


76 posted on 01/20/2012 2:47:26 PM PST by swampfox101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming; bolobaby; bcsco
I don't decide who gets zotted. I just do one of the after-action reports. May I suggest
that you check the posting history of the zottee? (link in my post) You may be able to
figure out why he was banned from posting.

If his worst-offending posts have been removed, you may not be able to tell why. In
that case you'll have to take your question up with the mods or with Jim Robinson.
77 posted on 01/20/2012 2:47:26 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Can someone set me straight..Newt has been married 3 times..this second wife was running around with Newt while he was still married to the first..am I correct? I am wondering how this woman has any high moral ground to stand on...sounds like what goes around comes around to me...she helped break up the first marriage...now her marriage is gone and wanting to ruin the man she cheated with in the first place..sour grapes??? Do I have this right?


78 posted on 01/20/2012 2:47:40 PM PST by leenie312
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

That is right, lots of good God fearing Ladies will be voting for Newt Gingrich. Look at the alternative... UGH!


79 posted on 01/20/2012 2:48:57 PM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I’m open for ideas.


80 posted on 01/20/2012 2:51:03 PM PST by Peter from Rutland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-250 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson