So, he and his wife had their discussion about the affair she had just discovered in front of the “kids”? That is what it would take for their word to mean anything. It is a he said, she said right now. Which one do you believe?
The daughters are not Marianne’s daughters. Do a little research before you post. You are woefully ignorant. They are adults that are supporting their Dad against old dredged up crap. (With a new open marriage spin thrown in).
He and Marianne were separated for 6-8 years - it was during that time he met Calista - yes, he was still ‘married, legally - but they had an agreement they were free to date others - he also kept supporting her during those years.
All that is , however, IRRELEVANT to the fact our country is on the brink of DYING - get it?
To dredge up a bitter ex-wife and rehash stuff she already said years ago is not NEWS. Even O’Reilly attacked Brian Ross on that - said he would never have done the story.
And to release it on the night of the debate. That is about as sleazy as it gets. Sleazy on her part, sleazy on ABC - sleazy on CNN.
And people realize that. That’s why Newt got a standing ovation, much to the consternation of the the sleaze CNN creep. It was the opposite of what they hoped for.
And it was a great example of just why Newt is the one that can wipe the floor with Obama.