The extent of your "educamation" seems to be an attempt to trash-talking most American Presidents. Sounds like the typical current American school curriculum, which is revisionism not education.
Showing that past presidents were human is not trash-talking or revision. You’re the one who said that Newt was not a suitable presidential candidate.
I only want to show you that he’s as suitable as everybody else who has served as president.
I’m the one who said that he may be flawed, but he values the office of president and wouldn’t do anything in office that would tarnish it, unlike the current one.