Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I'm officially endorsing Newt Gingrich for President today.
Jan 19, 2012 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 01/19/2012 12:41:04 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Edited on 01/19/2012 12:44:42 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 741-745 next last
To: surfer

Speaker Newt’s accomplishments, Willard the $50 Discount Abortioner, or Hussein’s reign.

Choose wisely.


301 posted on 01/19/2012 2:07:01 PM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Perry 2012 with Cain, Huck, Petraeus, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I wonder if any of you have done any due diligence on his background, and I don’t mean his personal life.

Gingrich is not a man of his word, he has a track record to prove this. I believe you all will regret wanting him as President.

Santorum is not as fiscally conservative as I would like, but he is no worse than Newt on that front, and he is a social conservative. Most importantly, he has character. I don’t care if Newt can debate someone under the table, we need a man of character in the White House or our country will not pull out of this mess.

___________

Just a little history to consider...

GUN CONTROL

Marietta (GA) Daily Journal from September 16, 1996. The headline is ‘Gingrich supports gun ban.’ I remember Newt’s betrayal of gun owners back in the 90s like it was yesterday,” said D.R. Leonard, Political Director of Georgia Gun Owners...

In 1996, Newt Gingrich turned his back on gun owners and voted for the anti-gun Brady Campaign’s Lautenberg Gun Ban, which strips the Second Amendment rights of citizens involved in misdemeanor domestic violence charges or temporary protection orders — in some cases for actions as minor as spanking a child.

Gingrich also stood shoulder to shoulder with Nancy Pelosi to pass the “Criminal Safezones Act” which prevents armed citizens from defending themselves in certain arbitrary locations. Virtually all Americans know that Criminal Safezones don’t protect law-abiding citizens, but actually protect the criminals who ignore them.

“But the biggest knife that Newt plunged into the back of all Americans and gun owners who wish to defend themselves and their families, was his coming out in support of a national thumbprint database for gun owners,” said Mr. Leonard.

“I think we prefer to go to instant check on an immediate basis and try to accelerate implementing instant checks so that you could literally check by thumbprint… Instant check is a much better system than the Brady process.” — Newt Gingrich, June 27, 1997

http://www.fitsnews.com/2011/12/05/georgia-gun-owners-blast-newt-gingrich/

AMNESTY

Gingrich seeks middle path on immigration

http://totalbuzz.ocregister.com/2011/10/13/gingrich-seeks-middle-path-on-immigration/68253/

“GINGRICH: No, but let me say this, John. No serious citizen who’s concerned about solving this problem should get trapped into a yes/no answer in which you’re either for totally selling out protecting America or you’re for totally kicking out 20 million people in a heartless way. There are — there are humane, practical steps to solve this problem, if we can get the politicians and the news media to just deal with it honestly.”June 2011 Debate Transcript

Amnesty (Nov 23, 11 - CNN Debate)

“Once you’ve put every piece in place, which includes the guest worker program, you need something like a World War II Selective Service Board that, frankly, reviews the people who are here,” Gingrich said at the debate. “If you’ve come here recently, you have no ties to this country, you ought to go home, period. If you’ve been here 25 years and you got three kids and two grandkids, you’ve been paying taxes and obeying the law, (and) you belong to a local church, I don’t think we’re going to separate you from your family, uproot you forcefully and kick you out.”

BUDGET

Gingrich - supporting the individual mandate, calling Paul Ryan’s budget plan “radical”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65HJE6Qe8FM&feature=share...video

NEWT: ERA OF REAGAN IS OVER

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2008/01/14/the_era_of_reagan_is_not_over

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=hwDFNummwNo

CONSTITUTION

“In 1994, Newt Gingrich described himself as a... fan of the ideas espoused in the book, The Third Wave by Alvin Toffler, in which homosexuality, promiscuity, adultery, divorce, and abortion are all viewed as perfectly normal and even desirable. He said that in order to understand him, you should read the book, The Third Wave by Toffler. This book is written from the perspective of someone who is writing a letter to America’s Founding Fathers, in which he describes the Constitution and the principles of limited government that guided our Founding Fathers as becoming increasing irrelevant, and obsolete, and hence in need of being radically redesigned and replaced!....When Newt Gingrich became the Speaker of the House in 1994, he recommended The Third Wave as required reading for all of his Congressional colleagues!”

http://www.newsavanna.com/meanderings/me201/me20101.html

GLOBALISM

Newt Gingrich supported GATT, NAFTA and WTO while in Congress.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2661574/posts

Mr. Toffler encourages the DEATH of the American Constitutional system. Mr Gingrich who wrote the forward in Toffler book “Creating A New Civilization” obviously agrees.

http://www.google.com/search?q=gingrich+Alvin+toffler+Book+forward&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=&oe=

HEALTHCARE

Newt supported an individual mandate in health insurance

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/a-lot-of-republicans-supported-the-individual-mandate/2011/05/09/AFi26Z0G_blog.html#

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/gingrich-health-care-insurance/2011/05/15/id/396426

Reminder: Newt Gingrich Teamed Up With Hillary Clinton, Wanted Government MANDATED Health Care

http://thespeechatimeforchoosing.wordpress.com/2011/11/04/reminder-newt-gingrich-teamed-up-with-hillary-clinton-wanted-government-mandated-health-care/

Howard Dean Endorses Newt

http://articles.cnn.com/2010-07-25/politics/gingrich.dean_1_newt-gingrich-gingrich-candidacy-howard-dean?_s=PM:POLITICS

Bill Clinton, Schumer endorse Newt - Nov 2011

http://theothermccain.com/2011/11/27/newt-gingrich-wins-coveted-gop-primary-endorsement-from-bill-clinton/

Newt with his BFFS Princess Pelosi, Kerry and Al Sharpton

http://www.mofopolitics.com/2011/11/09/friendly-reminder-newt-gingrich-is-a-rino-wimp-and-a-scumbag/

Newt loves HC mandates always has

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2011/05/13/newt-gingrich-long-time-supporter-of-health-insurance-mandates/3/

FOR/AGAINST ENTITLEMENT REFORM?

The one who says he is been for Entitlement Reform for 15 years?

http://news.yahoo.com/newt-gingrich-wants-entitlement-reforms-did-15-years-223600741.html

or the Newt who called the exact same plan when Paul Ryan purposed it “Right wing social engineering”

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/newt-gingrich-was-for-the-ryan-plan-before-he-was-against-it/

FANNIE MAE/FREDDIE MAC

Was paid $300,000 to lobby for Freddie Mae and Fannie Mach in 2006

http://thespeechatimeforchoosing.wordpress.com/2011/10/31/flashback-newt-took-300000-from-freddie-mac-to-stop-congress-from-making-much-needed-reform/

Endorsed by Barney Frank

http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/12/jon-huntsman-then-newt-gingrich-rep-barney-franks-favorite-gop-hopefuls/

FAIRNESS DOCTRINE

Newt Gingrich Co-Sponsored the 1987 Pro-Fairness Doctrine Bill

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/04/29/newt-gingrich-co-sponsored-the-1987-pro-fairness-doctrine-bill/

PROGRESSIVISM / UNIONS

GIngrich: FDR was the greatest President of the 20th century. Andy Stern is a Visionary Leader

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/gingrich-flashback-progressive-fdr-was-greatest-president-of-the-20th-century-plus-seius-andy-stern-is-visionary-union-leader/

FOR/AGAINST WATERBOARDING?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Newt_Gingrich#Torture

GLOBAL WARMING/CAP and TRADE

Newt: Too Green for 2012

http://www.themoralliberal.com/2011/01/27/newt-too-green-for-2012/

1989: Rep. Newt Gingrich (R-GA) co-sponsors the ambitious Global Warming Prevention Act (H.R. 1078), which finds that “the Earth’s atmosphere is being changed at an unprecedented rate by pollutants resulting from human activities, inefficient and wasteful fossil fuel use, and the effects of rapid population growth in many regions,” that “global warming imperils human health and well-being” and calls for policies “to reduce world emissions of carbon dioxide by at least 20 percent from 1988 levels by 2000.” The legislation recognizes that global warming is a “major threat to political stability, international security, and economic prosperity.” [H.R. 1078, 2/22/1989]

1992: Gingrich calls the environmental proposals in Al Gore’s book Earth in Balance “devastatingly threatening to most American pocketbooks and jobs.” [National Journal, 9/5/92]

1996: At a speech for the Detroit Economic Club, Gingrich mocks “Al Gore’s global warming,” citing “the largest snowstorm in New York City’s history”: “We were in the middle of budget negotiations; the football games were coming up and we noticed on the weather channel that an early symptom of Al Gore’s global warming was coming to the East Coast. And it does make you wonder sometimes, doesn’t it, how theoretical statisticians in the middle of the largest snowstorm in New York City’s history could stand there and say, ‘I don’t care what it’s doing. It’s going to get very hot soon.’” [FDCH Political Transcripts, 1/16/96]

1997: As Speaker of the House, Gingrich co-sponsors H. Con. Res. 151, which notes carbon dioxide is a “major greenhouse gas” that comes from “products whose manufacture consumes fossil fuels” and calls on the United States to “manage its public domain national forests to maximize the reduction of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.” [H. Con. Res. 151, 9/10/1997]

2007: Gingrich calls for a cap-and-trade system with tax incentives for clean energy. “I think if you have mandatory carbon caps combined with a trading system, much like we did with sulfur, and if you have a tax-incentive program for investing in the solutions, that there’s a package there that’s very, very good. And frankly, it’s something I would strongly support.” [Frontline, 2/15/07]

February 15, 2007: “I think if you have mandatory carbon caps combined with a trading system, much like we did with sulfur, and if you have a tax-incentive program for investing in the solutions, that there’s a package there that’s very, very good. And frankly, it’s something I would strongly support.” [Frontline, 2/15/07]

In a debate on climate policy with Sen. John Kerry (D-MA), Gingrich says “the evidence is sufficient that we should move towards the most effective possible steps to reduce carbon-loading of the atmosphere,” and that we should “do it urgently.” [ThinkProgress, 4/10/07]

In a Washington Post chat, Gingrich rejects a cap-and-trade system, saying it “would lead to corruption, political favoritism, and would have a huge impact on the economy.” He says he supports “tax credits for dramatically reducing carbon emissions.” [Washington Post, 4/17/08]

2008: In an advertisement made for Al Gore’s Alliance for Climate Protection, Gingrich sat with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and said that “we do agree our country must take action to address climate change.” [We Campaign, 4/18/08]

“I don’t think that we have conclusive proof of global warming. And I don’t think we have conclusive proof that humans are at the center of it.” [Newt.org, 4/22/08]

April 4, 2009: “And now, in 2009, instead of making energy cheaper—which would help create jobs and save Americans money—President Obama wants to impose a cap-and-trade regime. Such a plan would have the effect of an across-the-board energy tax on every American. That will make our artificial energy crisis even worse—and raising taxes during a deep economic recession will only accelerate American job losses.” [Newsweek, 4/4/09]

Pell grant for K-12 schools - Gingrich thinks more Federal government involvement in schools is a good thing.

SCOZZAFAVA

Gingrich supports radical leftist Dede Scozzafava (whom he champions as a “moderate Republican”) is getting heated pushback from Dallas Tea Party activists raising their voices at Borders Books in Dallas.

Here Gingrich snarks that conservatives who object to backing radical leftists don’t think Reagan was conservative enough:

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/23/dallas-tea-party-activists-push-back-against-gingrichs-straw-men/

Conservatives Laugh Off Gingrich Presidential Dreams

http://washingtonindependent.com/65261/conservatives-laugh-off-gingrich-presidential-dreams

Newt Gingrich a wolf in sheep’s clothing

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=4301673%3ABlogPost%3A29891&commentId=4301673%3AComment%3A498073&xg_source=activity

Left Wing of the GOP - Complete vetting of Newt Gingrich

https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=295749200447449

Stop the Insanity say no to Newt

http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-11-10/politics/30381368_1_newt-gingrich-conservatives-herman-cain

Newt for 2012? No, thanks.

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/26/newt-for-2012-no-thanks/

______________

MORE (from another source - sorry some things are duplicates)

04/02/1987 – He cosponsored the 1987 Fairness Doctrine

10/22/1991 – He voted for an amendment that would create a National Police Corps.

03/–/1993 – He Voted for sending $1.6 Billion in foreign aid to Russia.

11/19/1993 – He voted for the NAFTA Implementation Act.

11/27/1994 – He supported the GATT Treaty subjecting US Sovereignty to the WTO

04/25/1996 – Voted for the single largest increase on Federal education spending ($3.5 Billion)

04/10/1995 – He supported Federal tax dollars being spent on abortions.

06/01/1996 – He helped a Democrat switch parties in an attempt to defeat Ron Paul in the 1996 election.

01/22/1997 – Congress gave him a record-setting $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing.

11/29/2006 – He said that free speech should be curtailed in order to fight terrorism. Wants to stop terrorists from using the internet. Called for a “serious debate about the 1st Amendment.”

02/15/2007 – He supported Bush’s proposal for mandatory carbon caps.

09/28/2008 – Says if he were in office, he would have voted for the $700B TARP bailout.

10/01/2008 – Says in an article that TARP was a “workout, not a bailout.”

12/08/2008 – He was paid $300,000 by Freddie Mac to halt Congress from bringing necessary reform.

03/31/2009 – Says we should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans.

11/15/2010 – He defended Romneycare

12/05/2010 – He said that a website owner should be considered an enemy combatant, hunted down and executed, for publishing leaked government memos.

01/30/2011 – He lobbied for ethanol subsidies.

01/30/2011 – He suggested that flex-fuel vehicles be mandated for Americans.

02/13/2011 – He criticized Obama for sending less U.S. taxdollars to Egypt.

02/15/2011 – His book said that he believes man-made climate-change and advocated creating “a new endowment for conservation and the environment.”

03/09/2011 – He blames his infidelity to multiple wives on his passion for the country.

03/15/2011 – Says that NAFTA worked because it created jobs in Mexico.

03/19/2011 – He has no regrets about supporting Medicare drug coverage. (Now $7.2T unfunded liability)

03/23/2011 – He completely flip-flopped on Libyan intervention in 16 days.

03/25/2011 – He plans to sign as many as 200 executive orders on his first day as president.

04/25/2011 – He’s a paid lobbyist for Federal ethanol subsidies.

05/12/2011 – He was more supportive of individual health-care mandates than Mitt Romney.

08/01/2011 – He hired a company to create fake Twitter to appear as if he had a following.

10/07/2011 – He said he’d ignore the Supreme Court if need be.

11/16/2011 – Was revealed he actually received 1.6 million from Freddie Mac, vs. his previously stated $300,000-

2009-2010 Travels around the country with Al Sharpton and Arne Duncan to promote President Obama’s new educational policies: i.e. increased local control of schools with increased Federal subsidies and regulations from Washington.

2010 Supported ultra-liberal, pro-abortion, pro-union, establishment candidate Dede Scozzafava in New York’s 23rd Congressional District in a special election, over conservative candidate Doug Hoffman.

1995 Gingrich Wrote the foreword to Alvin Toffler’s book, “The Politics of the Third Wave, Creating a New Civilization” and advocated all members of Congress should read the book. The book calls for a “New Democracy” for the 21st century which is essentially based on following Plato’s Third Wave virtues:

1. Private property must be abolished, the wealthy hated and their wealth redistributed by state mandate.

2. Children belong to, and are born to serve the state. The influence of parents is noxious and disruptive to the interest of the state, thus every child should be raised in government nurseries, without knowledge of who his or her parents are and without the parents having knowledge of who their offspring are. Every child becomes the common property of every parent in the city. Every parent has the collective duty to watch over them.

3. Private education, like traditional parenting, is at the very headwaters of falsehood and social strife. It must be eliminated and replaced with a closely monitored state school system.

4. Old values passed down in history, song, children’s books, all need to be rewritten to discredit and erase the old virtues and to exalt and enthrone the new.

5. Frivolous children’s games eliminated, new games developed that emphasize law and order.

6. Private industry is self serving. State should have absolute control of all industry for benefit of the whole.

7. Class mobility is a revolutionary idea that threatens the stability of the state and the pre-eminence of true philosophy. A strict caste system and the elimination of career choice is the answer.

8. Talent must never be allowed to wander or be wasted. Early on, children must be identified and channeled by the state for the benefit of the state into careers selected by the state.

9. Under the guise of equality, women ought to be exploited: first to foment ‘class war’ during the Third Wave (women’s roles are reversed to men’s); next, to be promptly put into their place as part of a ‘community of women’ to be shared collectively by male guardians.

10. Selective breeding is beneficial to the state.

11. Unwanted babies, inferior babies, deformed babies, and the adult handicapped are an unnecessary drag on the prosperity and well-being of society. They should be left to die. Unproductive adults, likewise, should be terminated.

12. Homosexuality is morally acceptable and homosexual rape of lower-class males and boys is a right of rulers, guardians and war heroes.

13. Only a few men are foreordained to understand life and higher good… the rest are equivalent of dumb sheep.

14. Absolute loyalty to the government is vital for the success and safety of society. A state sanctioned National Police network is an essential good.

15. Wealth is not essential to the safety of the state.

- Gingrich voted to permit the Federal Reserve to purchase Treasury Debt

- Bailed out savings and loan institutions in 1991. $40B Bank bailout

- Gingrich voted to strengthen the federal home loan agencies

- Gingrich voted for increased powers to the FDIC to bail out struggling savings and loans through reorganization, purchase of bad assets, or recapitalization.

- Gingrich voted in favor of the Chrysler Bailout in 1979

- Gingrich voted for an oil windfall profits tax in 1979, which was signed by Jimmy Carter.

- Urged the House to repeal the War Powers Act and give the Presidency more power.

- Urged Clinton to expand military presence in Bosnia.

- Gingrich voted against a provision requiring congressional approval prior to deployment of U.S. troops into Central America in 1983.

- Gingrich voted to increase CIA secrecy and against any requirement that the President report covert activity to congress before it is initiated.

- Gingrich voted for Jimmy Carter’s “Energy Mobilization Board.”

- Gingrich voted for an increase in taxes on coal producers in 1981

- Gingrich voted for a 5-cent increase in the gas tax to fund highway and other mass-transit projects.

- Gingrich was one of the few who voted against the 1984 bill requiring the President and Congress to submit a balanced budget

- Gingrich voted for a congressional pay raise

- Gingrich voted against a bipartisan 1% cut to the Department of Defense budget for 1983


302 posted on 01/19/2012 2:07:23 PM PST by justsaynomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

Willard??? Is that you?


303 posted on 01/19/2012 2:09:00 PM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Perry 2012 with Cain, Huck, Petraeus, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

No, I’m darn clear-eyed. The only way to stop Romney is for non-Romneys to coalesce around one man. That’s either Newt or Santorum.

In the long run, Gingrich is doomed. You may give him a pass, but the double-standard general electorate won’t. I don’t care that Klintoon did it too.

After SC, Gingrich will begin to fade, an FR endorsement notwithstanding. But he and Santorum will extend their dividing of the vote long enough to give the nomination to Romney.

If by some fluke Gingrich gets the nomination, he will lose to Obama. But keeping both him and Santorum alive now only ensures Romney wins. No FReeper wants to hear that.

So, go ahead and shoot the messenger. But it’s a fact that Gingrich is damaged goods now. No amount of whistling past the graveyard will change that. Enough Republicans might keep whistling to get him the nomination, though I very much doubt it. If they do, we have Obama for four more years. If they don’t but Gingrich and Santorum continue to split the vote we get Romney and then Obama for four more years.

Not something you want to hear, but sometimes the truth is hard to take.

Responding with an ad hominem
doesn’t
really
help
anyone.


304 posted on 01/19/2012 2:09:09 PM PST by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
there are a lot of things not to like about Newt ... he's likely a big government progressive but he is far better than Romney

and it's high time the GOP stopped running candidates against the will of the base - just because it's 'their turn'

the entire party, delegate and nomination process is designed to give the entrenched party hacks a grand advantage over the rank and file

look what Bohner and Co. have done to the newbies elected by the Tea Party groups

Thank You for all that you do

.

305 posted on 01/19/2012 2:09:22 PM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Houghton M.

“They will impale him on this. If you can’t see that coming, you really don’t understand American politics.”

So, your view is that the liberal media gets to pick our candidate? They can pick the likes of Obama and Clinton but we had better run Jesus or else? I prefer to fight than cave. The American people respond to how Newt responds. They love a fighter. Cowards, wimps, and wussies need not apply to be President.


306 posted on 01/19/2012 2:10:16 PM PST by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
If it weren’t for Newt you wouldn’t even know what a conservative was today.

My knowledge of conservatism predates McNewt by over a decade. I thought Newt was the master of the egotistical statement. Perhaps I was wrong.

307 posted on 01/19/2012 2:10:36 PM PST by Ingtar (If Cain had to bow out, so should McNewt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Mr. Robinson,

Since you are not announcing a run for President as the Free Republic Party candidate, I guess Newt will have to do.

308 posted on 01/19/2012 2:10:46 PM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surfer

Did we ever get out of you who you are FOR, exactly? Hope it’s someone who has the math and the cash and the wind at his back to overtake Romney in South Carolina, by Saturday. That would be...........?


309 posted on 01/19/2012 2:11:15 PM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. NEWT 2012 / Ron Paul is already Third Party, inside OUR Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

LOL.....


310 posted on 01/19/2012 2:11:22 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO.....!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I held my nose and voted for McLame. It is less of a stretch to vote for Gingrich.

That scumbag commie lying cult leader from massachussetts must be stopped at any cost !

311 posted on 01/19/2012 2:11:22 PM PST by SENTINEL (Romney is to Conservatism what Mormonism is to Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Very confusing days at FR. Breaks my heart to see so many so called principled conservatives “sell out” just because they think this guy or that guy can win. it makes us the same as the moral compass less liberals of the world.

Watching some here gyrate themselves on Bain and on multiple affairs sitting on the Pelosi couch etc is almost comical if it wasn’t so sad. Instead of saying these guys -and I mean the whole GOP lot- offer nothing to FR so therefore we cannot support any of them, we have to have tortured logic in supporting newt. We are told on one hand he has asked for forgiveness and he is a different person now, but the only thing that is cited was his work when he was ....drum roll please....the person who everyone says he is not now. So what is it ? Is he different now ? or all we can go on is what he was in the 80’s ? Which is it ?

Count me out of this Newt campaign, watching him crash and burn and some on this site with him will be sad but predictable.


312 posted on 01/19/2012 2:11:22 PM PST by lakewood conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
VP - Perry
Agree ... just to see a Plugs/Perry debate ... or maybe not ... :^)

SoS - Rice
No. Condi went native when she was there before. Foggy Bottom needs a complete housecleaning: John Bolton's the guy to do it.

DoEnergy - Palin
Agree, that is if we don't get rid of DoEnergy completely, which Sarah would likely advocate.

DoDefense - West
Maybe, but the good colonel is in a great position as 1 of the 2 black GOP House members. Politically speaking, McCain might be a good SecDef choice: it would give Gov. Brewer a chance to appoint a solid conservative to serve out the rest of the RINO-in-chief's term.

313 posted on 01/19/2012 2:11:22 PM PST by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Houghton M.

“He will lose”

Dude, get lost. You try too hard. Obama is toast if we nominate Newt.


314 posted on 01/19/2012 2:11:46 PM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Perry 2012 with Cain, Huck, Petraeus, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Calm down. The ball is in Newt’s court to show she’s lying. You assume she is, out of wishful thinking.

If she’s lying and he persuades us, fine.

But he won’t deny what she said. The ball’s in his court.

Have it your way. You’ll end up with Rommney as the Republican candidate or, if you get Newt as the candidate, you’ll get Obama as your president.

Choose your poison since you won’t listen to reason.


315 posted on 01/19/2012 2:12:16 PM PST by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

LOL...

It’s Jim’s ship if he wants to toss me overboard that’s his choice.

We are a nation of individuals and we will never ALL agree...our country only gets better because we disagree.

I think it is way too early, I think anything can happen this year and I am not willing to throw my weight behind a person like Newt. Newt is going to spiral into the abyss and then what will we do?

Perry is out?

Are we trying to force Santorum out?

Support Newt know only insures Romney is going to get the nod.


316 posted on 01/19/2012 2:12:53 PM PST by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

are you series?


317 posted on 01/19/2012 2:12:53 PM PST by BuddaBudd (F U B O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Time to send a contribution to Newt, and then enjoy a snack...

318 posted on 01/19/2012 2:14:07 PM PST by The Citizen Soldier (Avoiding Obama by replacing him with Romney is like avoiding a Ford by replacing it with a Mercury)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Dude Houghton did not trip Newt so that he fell and landed on Marianne or Calista. That is all on Newt and the problem with Newt is not just that he tosses aside wives for new models, it is that he just as easily seduced by new age retardo ideas like anthropogenic global warming. Support him but do it with eyes open while holding his feet to the flames because he will triangulate faster than you can say William Jefferson Clinton.


319 posted on 01/19/2012 2:14:07 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Happy Newt Day! :)


320 posted on 01/19/2012 2:14:27 PM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 741-745 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson