Replies

Before making Marianne Gingrich the innocent victim here's a link to an FBI report, from 1997, being misrepresented on many online articles today to smear Newt Gingrich through this ex-wife. It appears someone in the Clinton administration FBI (probably a Reno/Gorelick plant) started an investigation to smear Newt Gingrich, which was shut down when it only led to apparent Israeli groups and operatives in the US.

FBI Gingrich Investigative Report

ON THE MAIN SUBJECT OF THE INVESTIGATION: PAY-OFFS

This FBI report depends solely on conversations of an Iraqi SOURCE, convicted felon Sarkis Soghanalian, with a Miami car salesman, Morty Bennett, concerning Bennett's claimed conversations with "Mirian" Gingrich. The FBI has no recordings for most of the claimed conversations between the SOURCE and Bennett and none for the claimed conversations between Bennett and "Mirian."

This investigative report only concerned 3rd party claims against "Mirian" Gingrich. It does not claim Newt Gingrich was ever involved by words or actions at any point in the investigation.

Additionally, the report claims the pay-off would be made to the "Institute for Political Studies... which is run by {Mirian} Gingrich, along with Robert Lowenberg." In fact the organization founded and run by Robert Lowenberg is the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies(IASPS), an Israeli think tank, based in Jerusalem, with an office in Washington. Neither Newt nor Marianne Gingrich worked for, let alone 'ran', the IASPS. Marianne Gingrich worked for the Israel Export Development Corporation (IEDC), with the Howard Ash mentioned in the report - who was also both a fund raiser for IASP and a Miami friend of Morty Bennett.

At this point the investigation ends.

SOMETHING ELSE RELEVENT TODAY IN THIS REPORT

Even so the below excerpts from the FBI report seem very relevant today, on the eve of MSM's "expose" portraying Miriam as the wronged ex- wife:

"(Bennett and his partner, Howard Ash) have a business deal that they were working with Marianne Gingrich"
"{Marianne} Gingrich replied... that her relationship with her husband was purely a relationship of convenience. She told the source that she needed her husband for economical reasons, and that he needed to keep her close because she knew all his "skeletons.""

What does this say about the credibility of this blackmailing &itch and the motivation ($$$) of her current "interviews?"

What does this say about the media portraying her as a loving wife whose husband betrayed that love?