Amen!
If the Establishment Republicans think they can ALWAYS give us a pro-abortion candidate in sheep's clothing and we'll just "roll over" and support him as an anti-Dem scenario vote, then...
#1...that's all we'd EVER get again from them...
#2...they don't know our conservative conscience very well.
If Mitt won the nomination...
...and if I voted for him...
...one day I'll have to explain to our Creator why I voted for someone who only four years ago...
-- a full three years after claiming to be "pro-life" due to a tale about realization who embryos were...
--and a full year after campaigning as "pro-life"...
...he (Mitt) told Katie Couric the following:
Couric: So what kind of embryos - embryos that are created for procreation and then would be discarded? Are those the ones that you feel are perfectly fine from which to cull cells for stem cell research?
Romney: Yes, those embryos that are referred to commonly as surplus embryos from in-vitro fertilization. Those embryos, I hope, could be available for adoption for people who would like to adopt embryos. But if a PARENT decides they would want to donate one of those embryos for purposes of RESEARCH, in my view, that's acceptable. It should not be made against the law.
Source: CBS, original interview aired Dec. 4, 2007, Candidates Reveal Their Biggest Mistakes
Any of you "parents" want to "donate" one of your offspring that the Creator has provided to you for "research" purposes? And then you still have the gall to call yourself "pro-life?"
I believe that no matter what you may do, the Creator already knows the what and the why of it. I don’t think any explanation is necessary.