Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2
A lot of great replies a wet land can as some have said be seasonal that is true but generally a wet land is more than .63 acres. So who live up stream and down and to the left and right of them I would venture to say they are guilty too.
20 posted on 01/18/2012 8:39:42 PM PST by guitarplayer1953 (Grammar & spelling maybe wrong, get over it, the world will not come to an end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: guitarplayer1953
If you look at the map, the property is located in what was likely the part of the outlet of a much larger seasonal swamp. Then people filled and drained along the lakefront and developed.

Some time later a second road was run through the seasonal swamp farther away from the shore and the outlet of the inland swamp redirected. The Sackett property just hadn't been filled before the wetland inventory was done unlike all of their neighbor's properties. It is indeed separated from the larger inland swamp by the second road and it's filled roadbed and ditches.

Some neighbor had it in for them. The local gov'ts were completely useless in helping to point this out well before the development of the Sackett property began and should be defendants too.

26 posted on 01/18/2012 9:18:32 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson