Exactly! There’s no suggestion of impropriety here from the underlying facts, yet they have to make it look like it’s underhanded or duplicitous by calling it ‘notorious.’
“Exactly!
Theres no suggestion of impropriety here from the underlying facts, yet they have to make it look like its underhanded or duplicitous by calling it notorious.”
####
And it worked. Even here on FR.
Thanks for perceiving the point I was making.