Every one of our candidates is flawed, and frankly Scuzzy's not going to make or break the case for me, nor should it for you considering who your candidate supported.
Scuzzyflava was the straw that broke the camel’s back.
Newt has a ton of baggage. I’m not happy with what he did with his wives, even more unhappy to find out that only the second was annulled.
A fact, that was helpfully brought up to me in May. I had assumed, along with others that both had been annulled, then I found out that he wasn’t.
I’m not happy with his flip flops on O-Care and on global warming. I just don’t trust the man to do the right thing when the crunch is down.
Like I said way back when. 90 percent is good, 10 percent is absolutely baffling. I’m not going to accept that 10 percent unless there is simply no one else.
Santorum, has been very consistant. You don’t see him swinging all over the place like you do with Newt. I like that in a candidate. I’d rather have someone that was the same when he came in at the start of 4 years as when he leaves.
Newt - just isn’t that type of person. I should like Newt - he’s got the same background I do, he taught history, and I do too. He’s an idea man more than someone who gets stuff done, so am I.
But because I am one, I know why I wouldn’t trust him at the helm if that makes a lick of sense. VP - yes. President, no.
And I’ll stick by that, even if everyone here makes fun of me for doing so.