Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VinL
Then, incredibly, you argue that God’s command to refrain from judgment is superceded by an obligation to personally enforce the tenets of the Lord- e.g negative behavior

Who's enforcing?

The whole discussion is about whether one is allowed to ever speak negatively about behavior. You claim never, yet you are judging me. What a laugh.

A christian leader who doesn't like sexual immorality. Horrors! Who has heard of such a thing?

Amazing how so many Freepers who claim to be christian are up in arms over a christian leader in the family arena who desires sexual purity in a Presidential candidate. Really quite amazing.

235 posted on 01/17/2012 6:29:39 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: Siena Dreaming

The whole discussion is about whether one is allowed to ever speak negatively about behavior. You claim never, yet you are judging me. What a laugh.

******************
No!!! Yu’re not off the hook for your un-Christian position. The discussion is NOT about speaking to negative behavior, it’s about Dobson and you saying that Calista can not be a First Lady because she is “immoral”!

That’s the discussion. That’s why you’re losing the debate! Because your position is un-Christian and indefensible.

You and Dobson prefer a different candidate- fine!!!! To caste Calista as a prostitute unfitting of being First Lady in order to support your nominee, is a black mark to one’s soul.

Contrary to your dismissive- “that’s a laugh”— it is not! Thankfully, there is a forgivng God.


238 posted on 01/17/2012 6:44:27 PM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson