Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grumpygresh
So now, it looks like we have an awful nominee that is infintely better than ZERO. YUCK!!! So that means we have a choice between mananged decline with mittens versus a chaotic, unpredictable implosion with zero.

I'm not a Romney fan but I will vote for him if it comes down to him vs. our Dear Leader. While I don't know know what kind of President Romney would actually be (lots of conjecture, but still unknown), our biggest hope is three-fold: get rid of Obama, keep the House and gain a majority in the Senate. While I prefer a leader who knows who and what he is, with conservative control of the two houses we can point Romney in the right direction.

No, this isn't the ideal situation, but at this point my main concern is making our Dear Leader a one-term President.

58 posted on 01/16/2012 10:49:39 AM PST by Kharis13 (That noise you hear is our Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Kharis13

I agree with you and I would vote for mitt over zero. But, that being said, I am not under any illusion that mittens will be able to stem the decline this country faces. mitt is not the movement conservative that this country desparately needs. We are in a similar position to 3rd century Rome. Perhaps, a placeholder and technocrat like romney will give us enough time for a real conservative to emerge.
A second zero term poses the real threat of imminent collapse, violence and a hard tyranny.


80 posted on 01/16/2012 11:49:23 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; zero sera dans l'enfer bientot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson