We are sunk with a nice guy Romney who continues to say Barry is a nice guy just in over his head. We are doomed unless someone brings out Valerie Jarret’s background as well as BO’s and hammers in what it will be like if they win a second term. Yes, we need to scare people to death and not be afraid to do it. Mitt won’t do it, especially with BO lovin McCain at his side. Newt is the only one with the guts to call out the OBama’s as the radicals that they are.
“We are sunk with a nice guy Romney who continues to say Barry is a nice guy just in over his head. “
*****
RINO Romney isn’t a nice guy. Look at what he did to Newt in Iowa through henchmen.
The problem is that Romney can’t attack Obama’s policies because they’re also Romney’s policies. Perhaps the only distinction between the two is that Obama truly does hate the United States and seeks to change it into a European sh*thole because of it. Romney heads down the same path in the spirit of crony capitalism rather than anti-American views.
Exactly, Romney is going to be another McCain, refuses to besmirsch his opponent. I don’t think I can handle another Republican campaign where Obama throws his “digs” and uses his middle finger when talking about a Republican candidate. Newt won’t be saying “my friends”. He would be willing to bring up the dirt on Obama’s background. Unlike the weasel McCain. Newt hasn’t been neuted...he still has a great set of balls.
"dandiegirl" is on to something in her recognition that the Republican candidate for 2012 must not naively describe his opponent, even at this early date, as being simply a nice guy who is in over his head.
The battle for the ideas of liberty over those of redistribution, resulting in slavery of individuals to deficit, debt, taxation, and rule by a political elite is too important to describe their main 2012 advocate so lightly.
"[With the decline of society] begins, indeed, the bellum omnium in omnia [war of all against all], which some philosophers observing to be so general in this world, have mistaken it for the natural, instead of the abusive state of man. And the fore horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression." --Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval, 1816. ME 15:40
Had America's Founders treated King George's commitment and resolve simply as the actions of an uninformed "guy," there would have been no Declaration of Independence--a statement which clearly outlined the "reasons" for their opposition to him and his policies.
They did not treat him as just a "nice guy" who didn't understand that large, intrusive, controlling and coercive government destroys the unalienable rights individuals possess by edict of their Creator. They stated their cause clearly, and they laid out for the world to see his spending, taxing, and planning philosophy which enslaved people.
Jefferson, the great intellectual and talented writer of the day, was able to articulate their ideas and "encapsulate" those "abstract ideas" (Lincoln) in our document of freedom where they remain, as Lincoln further described, a "stumbling-block to the very harbingers [initiators of threatening change] of reappearing tyranny and oppression."
Where is the candidate able to perform that task on the behalf of liberty from now till November?