End of the line, huh Chris. Can’t define your existential concept of capitalism without reference to markets; nor without refernce to goods, and the manufacturers of the same, and the end users. That’s why your argument failed, nice try though.
Don’t need to.
The concept of capitalism exists wether or not there is a sentinent being there to contemplate that concept or not, it is simply unrealized at the time, just as time exists whether or not there is a sentinent being there to record its passage or contemplate its existence. It simply hasn’t beeen realized at the time.
End of the line, huh VinL? Can’t define your concept of an ethical car, can you? How about an unethical car? No? Didn’t think so. That’s why your argumnent failed, and that’s why Newt’s argument failed, and that’s why Newt will fail.
His thin skin has revealed exactly who he is. He’s the guy who, if you run enough negative adds against him, will turn his guns on the very foundations of his own country in an effort to shoot down the creator of the adds. Do we need a president ad reckless as this? I know I don’t.
Good luck getting him the nod.