Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge rules against Rick Perry's Virginia ballot suit
Politico ^ | January 13, 2012 | EMILY SCHULTHEIS

Posted on 01/13/2012 1:49:52 PM PST by Quicksilver

Following a hearing in Richmond today, U.S. district judge John Gibney ruled against Rick Perry's challenge to the Virginia ballot rules.

In his opinion, Gibney says Perry, and the other candidates who joined the challenge, waited too long to bring the suit.

"They knew the rules in Virginia many months ago; the limitations on circulators affected them as soon as they began to circulate petitions," he writes. "They plaintiffs could have challenged the Virginia law at that time. Instead, they waited until after the time to gather petitions had ended and they had lost the political battle to be on the ballot; then, on the eve of the printing of absentee ballots, they decided to challenge Virginia's laws. In essence, they played the game, lost, and then complained that the rules were unfair."

The decision means Perry, as well as Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Jon Huntsman, will not appear on the ballot in the state's March 6 primary.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: perry; perry2012; perry2020; vagop; vaprimary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-163 next last
To: Quicksilver

How about none of the above (NOTA)? If you don’t like these clowns do a NOTA or write a name in. Depriving them of votes is a perfectly acceptable and effective means of hurting these two.


81 posted on 01/13/2012 5:37:14 PM PST by dools0007world
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

No way the establishment GOP pukes want Paul. This primary, I am all about pissing those blue-bloods right the hell off.


I just joined your ranks about 2.5 minutes ago. F’em.


82 posted on 01/13/2012 5:43:13 PM PST by txhurl (EVERYONE is losing their virginity in this election. -Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: simplesimon

Maybe Altura, Shield or CW would remember the court case name ????


It was a Colorado case, that’s all I can remember.


83 posted on 01/13/2012 5:47:02 PM PST by txhurl (EVERYONE is losing their virginity in this election. -Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver; onyx; DJ MacWoW; RedMDer; trisham; kristinn; TheOldLady; musicman; vox_freedom; ...

Not certain of the election process vagaries in VA, or if these candidates messed up with their adherence, BUT

how convenient that Judge Gibney can clear the slate a bit for his boss/patron. Ethical, conflict of interest?

~~~~~~~~~

John A. Gibney

Current Court Information:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Title: Judge
Station: Richmond, VA
Service:
Appointed by: Barack Obama
Active: 12/16/2010 - Current
Preceded by: Robert Payne
Personal History
Born: 1951
Home State: Coatesville, PA
Bachelors: College of William & Mary, 1973
Law School: U. of Virginia Law, 1976
Contents
[hide]

John Adrian Gibney, Jr. is a federal judge on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. He was nominated to the court by President Obama on April 14, 2010 and confirmed by the Senate on December 16, 2010. [1]

*snip*

Gibney was recommended to the President by Virginia U.S. senators Jim Webb and Mark Warner

http://judgepedia.org/index.php/John_A._Gibney


84 posted on 01/13/2012 6:06:08 PM PST by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cicero; P-Marlowe; wmfights
The decision makes sense, I guess, but too bad about Gingrich and Santorum.

It does not make sense if the question was the constitutionality of the process and the exclusion of candidates.

Something is either unconstitutional or not. The judge can't very well argue, "Yeah, it's unconstitutional, but you gotta do it anyway because you waited to long to complain."

Something is either unconstitutional or it isn't. It was a dumb ruling.

85 posted on 01/13/2012 6:16:01 PM PST by xzins (Vulture Capitalism is Crony Capitalism on Crack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

It’s always convenient to have a democrat appointed judge, particlarly one appointed by the Marxist.


86 posted on 01/13/2012 6:25:26 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

It’s always convenient to have a democrat appointed judge, particularly one appointed by the Marxist.


87 posted on 01/13/2012 6:25:44 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver; STARWISE
Snip: the decision means Perry, as well as Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Jon Huntsman, will not appear on the ballot in the state's March 6 primary.

So, I guess it's Mittens or no-vote so that the Marxist controls the GOP Primary election via the Rat appointee.

88 posted on 01/13/2012 6:28:49 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

“He is already trying to get his people installed as delegates in states and if he can force a brokered convention, he will have the keys to the car. This is not good.”

First off, full disclosure: I’m a supporter of the Paul faction.

If you’d asked me three weeks ago, I would have said that Ron Paul was going to seriously consider going third party. Then I realized that I was completely wrong about the objectives of the campaign. The presidency in 2012 isn’t the ultimate goal of Ron Paul or his supporters. The Paul faction has a much bigger fish in mind.

And there isn’t a chance in hades that he’s going third party.


89 posted on 01/13/2012 6:32:17 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (The gop is as much a plantation for conservatives as the 'rat party is for blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver

Every VA primary voter should pull the lever for Paul sending a clear messages to the establishment scumbags.


90 posted on 01/13/2012 6:43:37 PM PST by Gene Eric (C'mon, Virginia -- are you with us or against us?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

The Paul faction has a much bigger fish in mind.


Like what.


91 posted on 01/13/2012 6:47:28 PM PST by txhurl (EVERYONE is losing their virginity in this election. -Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Someone from Virginia, please correct me if I am wrong.

As I understand the judicial ruling,the State of Virginia has very stringent requirements for qualifying to be on the ballot.One might even correctly call them onerous or unfair.
But in order to challenge the requirements successfully, the complaint should have been made at the beginning or middle of the qualification process, not at the end.
The challenge/suit was not made in a timely manner.
Two candidates managed to meet the requirements, and are on the ballot. Many other candidates did not meet or exceed the minimum requirements, and also did not challenge the rules well prior to qualification deadlines. Probably one of the reasons Virginia crafted the ballot requirements in the first place was that the State of Virginia wanted the citizens of Virginia votes to weigh heavily on the nation as an early primary State.The requirements are not “new”. That the validation process regarding signatories to petitions was tightened even further is beside the point.

As a Florida resident, I applauded the decision of the State of Florida, to hold our primary “early”, no matter what sanctions the “National Republican Convention” threatened us with.
In part, because we have a closed party primary, and also because we require all voters to show ID, in order to vote.

Those who claim to be Republicans in Virginia have three choices now.
Romney, Paul, or write “intentionally left blank” on your ballot form.

92 posted on 01/13/2012 7:27:47 PM PST by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

“Like what.”

If you’ve gone to your local party meetings in TX of late, who else has been there?


93 posted on 01/13/2012 7:27:54 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (The gop is as much a plantation for conservatives as the 'rat party is for blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

“Running an effective campaign will be critical in ending Obama’s rule. Money will also be critical. GOTV doesn’t happen by accident. What were these guys thinking four years ago?”

They weren’t. Heck, their strategic thinking doesn’t seem to go longer than 4 weeks.

Two candidates on the gop ticket were thinking, though. One was mitt romney. The other is Ron Paul and his supporters.


94 posted on 01/13/2012 7:31:55 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (The gop is as much a plantation for conservatives as the 'rat party is for blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: altura

“I’m blaming the idiots who seem to be running the Republican party in Virginia.”

As you should. And they’ll be replaced in short order. And I’ll be happy to do my little part to help.


95 posted on 01/13/2012 7:34:46 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (The gop is as much a plantation for conservatives as the 'rat party is for blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver

This wasn’t right at all. This was done in a hurry to help Mitt. The Gov and AG there are 100% pro Mitt. What a shame for states right for the citizen (which didn’t matter) The same AG fighting Obamacare.


96 posted on 01/13/2012 7:42:36 PM PST by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

Correct and that’s why they’re on top. Proper planning prevents poor performance. Luck doesn’t just happen, those two were working for it. That says something and here we are the fractured conservative base left out in the cold again. Do you think they have our number or are we bugged?


97 posted on 01/13/2012 7:45:33 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver

The longest train wreck in history...continues.


98 posted on 01/13/2012 7:58:45 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver

Sounds like this is now of extreme unimportance.


99 posted on 01/13/2012 9:25:29 PM PST by Theodore R. (I'll still vote for the Right Rick --Santorum-- if he is on the April 3 ballot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altura

Perry should spend next week just touring SC like he were a tourist, instead of the candidate of which he can no longer really claim to be. That way his donors can pay for an extra week’s vacation travel.


100 posted on 01/13/2012 9:28:10 PM PST by Theodore R. (I'll still vote for the Right Rick --Santorum-- if he is on the April 3 ballot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson