Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is exactly the problem with Newt. He is the ultimate say anything, any time, all the time guy.
1 posted on 01/13/2012 1:49:09 PM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: indianrightwinger

He imploded after being given a 2nd chance and he deserves to be forgotten about. Same with Perry. They are both liars and showed their true colors. “Win at any cost.” I am thankful and still have hope in American Conservatives who now seem to be uniting and ready to support the less than perfect Romney.

And Obama and the Dems fear him more than any other candidate.


2 posted on 01/13/2012 1:54:15 PM PST by JNRoberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

He’s nothing of the sort. He’s a brilliant man who got his feelings hurt and seems to have lost his perspective...TEMPORARILY. I’m praying he’ll get it together. Romney is no more corrupt for his years at Bain Capital than Newt is for his business dealings and at some point, hopefully before its too late, he’ll go back to showing why he’s the best man to lead the country.


3 posted on 01/13/2012 1:55:13 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

“The Gingrich narrative — that Romney made money by laying off good working men and women ...” Happens to be true, sparky. Milt Romiiny is a lying scumbag and his stealth supporters at FR get the zot regularly. Want the lightening?


13 posted on 01/13/2012 2:10:08 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DJ MacWoW; TitansAFC; Gator113; Deb; PSYCHO-FREEP; katiedidit1

Written by Timothy P. Carney, who calls Ru Paul a conservative and who can't distinguish "investment profits" from "job creation".

Newt Gingrich is a Reagan Conservative with many accomplishments and the best qualified of all the candidates to be POTUS and Commander in Chief

GO NEWT!.

14 posted on 01/13/2012 2:12:20 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

Go Newt!


22 posted on 01/13/2012 2:19:24 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

Yep


29 posted on 01/13/2012 2:28:21 PM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

On the basis of comparison of records in governance, there is simply no contest who is best prepared to defend the Constitution and conservatism as president. Newt Gingrich had to first take down the establishment republicans before he could become the conservative revolutionary and take out the democrats in the House after 40 years.

Look who supports Romney now, led by John Sununu (advisor who influenced Bush 41 to break the no new taxes pledge, and brought us Justice Souter), Bush 41, who does not forgive Newt for standing with him when Newt refused to be part of the new new taxes betrayal The ‘victorious’ John McCain and a whole gaggle of the moderates who didn’t get us anything but defeat in ‘08 and showed us we need to be ‘fair’ with the historic Obama. Compare that to who supports Newt, led by Art Laffer, architect of Reaganomics, Thomas Sowell, Palin’s (Todd has publicly, Sarah has all but said it) and you will know where we are as a party.

Romney can claim credit for running a successful business, making money and restructuring some businesses. He claims his efforts created 100 thousand jobs. Newt can claim credit for being a key driver of Supply-Side economics and helping enact laws that created an economic environment that led to 11 million new jobs. Newt went on to become Speaker of the House, led to spending and taxing reform, forced Clinton to a ‘Triangulation’ strategy and was in power during a time when unemployment was effectively 4%. The markets soared after the American people voted in the Gingrich House, because Newt’s conservative leadership created consumer confidence. Anyone who wants to credit Clinton need only look at his decisions before Newt, and after.

Gingrich took action on the Clinton crime enterprise, formed the Burton committee and took action on crimes that aligned with a tremendous advance in Chinese technological capabilities. Not a day goes by that we don’t suffer economically from China’s advance. By necessity, many jobs that were ‘saved’ by Bain’s acquisitions had to go overseas. Newt Gingrich pushed the House committee that led to the Impeachment of Clinton. Without his strength, Gore would have had an easy course to the presidency in 2000. Newt left the congress strong and conservative, the moderates ran it into the ground.

The moderate GOP senate never forgave Newt for forcing the Impeachment Trial into their hands. When the heat came on Newt for that phony ethics problem in ‘98, it was moderates who turned on him. Moderates are the problem - Romney is a moderate.

Our country owes a debt of gratitude for Newt’s record of service in governance. Romney has one unimpressive term as governor of Mass. All his other service has been as a capitalist who in many ways benefitted from the efforts of Newt Gingrich. I will be thrilled to elect Romney the president of the Chamber of Commerce. May his skills in business be shared with us all.

For President of the United Staes, I want the candidate with the real record of conservative service and results for our country. I support Newt Gingrich.


60 posted on 01/13/2012 3:49:17 PM PST by untwist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

After he says anything he will say the opposite


92 posted on 01/13/2012 5:38:22 PM PST by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Yet another unctuous, hysterical rant by an apparent ideologue.

Gotta love these armchair Capitalists.


102 posted on 01/13/2012 7:10:22 PM PST by Gene Eric (C'mon, Virginia -- are you with us or against us?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

This is a Parody of Mitt Romney Right?


107 posted on 01/14/2012 5:58:31 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

This is a Parody of Mitt Romney Right?


108 posted on 01/14/2012 5:58:56 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indianrightwinger

This is a Parody of Mitt Romney Right?


109 posted on 01/14/2012 5:59:10 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

btrl


111 posted on 01/15/2012 11:11:16 AM PST by Clinging Bitterly (We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson