Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Will88
"Lol, if you think that answers to questions of health and nutrition will be found in politics and not in science, then go ahead and think it."

Your reading comprehension leaves much to be desired.

"Do you really believe what you posted in #43?"

Yes, I do believe that anyone who relies on "scientific consensus" / "conventional wisdom" / "arguments from authority" - are embracing a logical fallacy.

96 posted on 01/13/2012 10:33:22 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Matchett-PI
Yes, I do believe that anyone who relies on "scientific consensus" / "conventional wisdom" / "arguments from authority" - are embracing a logical fallacy.

Lol, what nonsense. You're conflating all the nonsense that surrounds the global warming hoax and pretending that it applies to a simple statement that the answer to questions concerning health and nutrition will be found in science.

And you're preaching to me about reading comprehension? Go off on whatever wild tangents you choose, but they have nothing to do with my basic statements on this thread.

124 posted on 01/13/2012 10:58:09 AM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson