Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Carolina Primary: Romney 28%, Gingrich 21%, Santorum 16%, Paul 16%
Rasmussen ^ | January 13, 2012 | Scott Rasmussen

Posted on 01/13/2012 8:28:30 AM PST by Qbert

Mitt Romney still holds first place in the South Carolina Primary field, while his opponents jockey for second with the voting eight days away.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Republican Primary Voters in South Carolina finds Romney ahead with 28% support, but now former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is in second place with 21% of the vote.  Support for former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum who was in second a week ago has fallen back to 16%, putting him dead even with Texas Congressman Ron Paul who also earns 16%.

This South Carolina survey of 750 Likely Republican Primary Voters was conducted on January 12, 2012 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 4 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: gingrich; romney; ronpaul; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: Ulysse; All

“Could GINGRICH and SANTORUM meet and talk?”

I fully agree. I think Santorum is a really great guy, and normally I would back him first. However, in this cycle, I think Newt would be the better GOP pick to go against the current POTUS. Ultimately, in my thinking a Gingrich/Santorum ticket would be ideal. If Santorum would drop out and endorse Newt, with Newt saying that Santorum WILL be his VP pick....I think it would get traction.

It is really time for Rick Perry, God Bless him, to get out of the race. He also should back Newt.

Ron Paul doesn’t concern me because those persons that would vote for him probably won’t vote for anyone else. So, he is just wasting time. IF I were running for POTUS, I would not want his endorsement.


21 posted on 01/13/2012 8:49:13 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

"Overall, Newt hasn’t gained and Santorum has lost ground to Perry."

Perry is at 5-6% in every poll in SC. He took 1% in NH. And he's currently at 2% in FL. He's the first one that needs to be voted off the island...

22 posted on 01/13/2012 8:49:46 AM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

“Yes Independents can vote in the SC primary so I was thinking Rasmussen should have had some indenpendents in that poll.”

Oh great....another open primary.


23 posted on 01/13/2012 8:51:02 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl; Cincinatus' Wife; altura; Chasaway

Santorum is the key.

If you go by this poll, and speaking only of SC, Santorum plus Gingrich easily beats Romney.

Since Gingrich is leading among the non Romneys, and speaking only of SC and only by this poll...

Santorum is the key.

It is so old, rote and shopworn to have all these threads where posters demand that Perry drop out or Santorum AND Perry drop out, and try to pretend that Perry is the key to ANYTHING. Not at this time he isn’t.

I would argue that he has by far the best record, is the only non Washington figure, has by far the best plan and on and on. But as for impacting the horse race...no.

Santorum supporters obviously don’t want their guy to drop out...most of them don’t trust the volatile Newt.


24 posted on 01/13/2012 8:51:12 AM PST by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR" - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Yelp run as a team....Paul should be given the task of auditing the Fed Reserve....Should make his followers happy.


25 posted on 01/13/2012 8:51:22 AM PST by hoosiermama (David (in the Bible) had problems with adultery and GOD used him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

“What is Perry’s number? Rasmussen doesn’t even list Perry. Yet if you add the numbers up, there are 19% unaccounted for. I’m sure most are undecided, but Perry must be getting some support.”

6%. See link:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/sc/south_carolina_republican_presidential_primary-1590.html


26 posted on 01/13/2012 8:54:51 AM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Right now I feel like the guy in the movie Groundhog Day since I’ve seen this scenario play out SO many times before!

There are far more people in this country who call themselves conservative but when the smoke settles all we ever have left to vote for is socialism lite!

GO NEWT!


27 posted on 01/13/2012 8:55:27 AM PST by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Rush talked recently about the New Hampshire exit polling for Ron Paul, saying the the polls indicated a large percentage of RP supporters had no intention of voting for Paul in the general election, but would vote for Obama. I’m trying to find a story with those exit poll numbers. Can anyone direct me to it?

Thanks


28 posted on 01/13/2012 8:57:17 AM PST by RavenATB ("Destroy the family and you destroy the country!" ~Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

So long as Herman Cain is there to be sure Ron Paul gets the math right.


29 posted on 01/13/2012 8:59:11 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

I am catholic/christian trying to use reason.
And some evangelicals and also catholics are boring when they stay focused on a very narrow point of view...It might be ,actually, hardly Evangelical since that so-called “social conservatism” is blind on some very big issues which can’t be taken apart from the others.

Real Conservatives must try to see the whole picture and to be WISER than the average lunatic liberals.

Or maybe some “evangelicals” or “catholics” are trolls in order to divide ....

We should try to hold together freedom, truth-morality,and God ! Since we are not muslims but christians


30 posted on 01/13/2012 8:59:14 AM PST by Ulysse (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

Newt will be a WHackado president, not a conservative. He will hurt the brand of conservatism if he runs as a conservative, which he isn’t. If Santorum is his veep, he might be hurt by doing so.

I wish I trusted newt the way you all do.


31 posted on 01/13/2012 8:59:43 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

They want Perry out and are apparently going to make that happen. ;-(


32 posted on 01/13/2012 9:00:50 AM PST by Kenny (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Perry is at 6%, where he’s been for a long time, but Huntsman has surprisingly gotten up to 5% in SC.


33 posted on 01/13/2012 9:01:07 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
Above all else, RINOs must be punished ! We are in a war for the survival of our country and Mitt Romney is the Benedict Arnold of 2012 ! This must be dealt with BEFORE we can win against our enemies the democrats.

I intend to write in George Washington for president and vote conservative on all other ballot measures.

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton


34 posted on 01/13/2012 9:01:21 AM PST by SENTINEL (Romney is to Conservatism what Mormonism is to Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette; All

“I would argue that he has by far the best record, is the only non Washington figure, has by far the best plan and on and on. But as for impacting the horse race...no. Santorum supporters obviously don’t want their guy to drop out...most of them don’t trust the volatile Newt.”

Your points about Santorum and his supporters are valid. Personally, I would never “demand” he drop out. I have too much respect for Rick Santorum. However, I do “wish” he and Newt could work out a deal.


35 posted on 01/13/2012 9:02:10 AM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ulysse
Sorry, but I don't vote for backstabbing, hypocritical phony like Newt Gingrich. Folks around here are sadly deluding themselves about him and how he would govern, IF he somehow got elected.
36 posted on 01/13/2012 9:02:47 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bigun

The youngest credible one (is that Santorum?) should be lined up as veep, because that’s usually the heir apparent to the candidacy from the party of a president who has served two terms. Perry is the only one who had been a governor, so might make sense as the immediate candidate, but his showing in the polls is very anemic, and throwing support to him might not boost him over Mitt Romney.


37 posted on 01/13/2012 9:05:15 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
I like everything about Newt except his issue with trustworthiness. We know the media will ask him unfair questions and how does he answer them? My husband was in the military, then DOD at Stratcom, and now he is one of those evil military contractors. Those of you who had to have a top secret clearance to do your job will understand these questions. How does he answer them or similar ones?

Newt, military and DOD employee can't get or can lose their top secret clearance for having an affair. One of the main reasons is they can be blackmailed. How can voters be sure you only had two affairs and not susceptible to blackmail? Andrea Mitchell

Newt, the obamas look like the ideal family, while you have had issues with your trustworthiness? How do the voter know they can trust you?
George Stuffleupagus

38 posted on 01/13/2012 9:05:42 AM PST by Linda Frances (You rate Santorum too low. HeÂ’s as intelligent and well-informed as Gingrich; he has a terrific leg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parksstp; KansasGirl

Here would be an interesting simulation to run.

Since everybody on this forum seems to think like Kansas Girl: “Conservatives have to make a move and unite behind a single candidate NOW or Romney is going to be the nominee even though he is uwanted by 75% of the GOP voters.”,

What if everybody stayed in and actually allowed each state to go through the primary process and primary voters voted like the Rasmussen poll predicts, the Romney: 28.5%Gingrich: 23% Paul: 18% Santorum: 11.5%. in every state.

Would Romney then have enough committed delegates to win the nomination by virtue of winning the winner-take-all states with 28.5% plurality of the votes plus 28.5% of the proportional state delegates, or would the conservative opposition to Romney have more delegates at the Republican National Convention?

The reason to project this out would be to convince conservatives that they do not need to run over the Romney cliff like a bunch of lemmings, just because Romney has the 20-something percent of Republicans who are liberals in his pocket.


39 posted on 01/13/2012 9:05:42 AM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

G and S would be a big government conservative ticket.


40 posted on 01/13/2012 9:06:49 AM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson