Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Carolina Primary: Romney 28%, Gingrich 21%, Santorum 16%, Paul 16%
Rasmussen ^ | January 13, 2012 | Scott Rasmussen

Posted on 01/13/2012 8:28:30 AM PST by Qbert

Mitt Romney still holds first place in the South Carolina Primary field, while his opponents jockey for second with the voting eight days away.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Republican Primary Voters in South Carolina finds Romney ahead with 28% support, but now former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is in second place with 21% of the vote.  Support for former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum who was in second a week ago has fallen back to 16%, putting him dead even with Texas Congressman Ron Paul who also earns 16%.

This South Carolina survey of 750 Likely Republican Primary Voters was conducted on January 12, 2012 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 4 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: gingrich; romney; ronpaul; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
Friday the 13th.
1 posted on 01/13/2012 8:28:41 AM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Go Newt!!


2 posted on 01/13/2012 8:31:00 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

If all the non-Romneys could agree on who will bear the standard, Romney would soon be yesterday’s news.


3 posted on 01/13/2012 8:32:48 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Just did a quick average of this Rasumssen poll and the ARG poll posted a little further down

Romney: 28.5
Gingrich: 23
Paul: 18
Santorum: 11.5


4 posted on 01/13/2012 8:33:14 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Conservatives have to make a move and unite behind a single candidate NOW or Romney is going to be the nominee even though he is uwanted by 75% of the GOP voters.


5 posted on 01/13/2012 8:33:52 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

We already had a Free Republic poll and the clear winner was Newt!


6 posted on 01/13/2012 8:35:07 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Rasmussen does not weight his republican primaries when he should be doing so.

The weightings should be: I. likely voters in the repub primary: 1. republican conservative 2. repub moderate/lib 3. independent conserve, 4. independ moderate/lib

I’m assuming cross-over voting is permitted in S Carolina. I don’t really know.


7 posted on 01/13/2012 8:36:31 AM PST by xzins (Pray for Our Troops Remaining in Afghanistan, now that Iran Can Focus on Injuring Only Them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Could GINGRICH and SANTORUM meet and talk ?

Is that so difficult ? It’s not about them but for the future of USA...and beyond


8 posted on 01/13/2012 8:37:19 AM PST by Ulysse (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

This is not good news for Newt.

I have simulated 7 following counties so far and have Newt at 21.41%. He is flat.

Anderson
Richland
Charleston
Aiken
Abbeville
Allendale
Oconee

With Santorum at 16%, it seems that Perry is garnering more Evangelical support than I thought in the NW. This leads to suggest that those not supporting to Santorum are turning to Perry before going to Gingrich, which is not good.

Once again, Paul is also running higher. I had him in the 13-15%. His increase may bring down slightly Romney’s percentages in Columbia and Charleston.

Overall, Newt hasn’t gained and Santorum has lost ground to Perry. If Santorum (who I had at 21.71%) had lost ground to Newt, then Gingrich should have been up over 25%. The fact he isn’t leads me to believe Gingrich has issues in the NW part of the state and that Perry is taking more votes than I though.


9 posted on 01/13/2012 8:39:16 AM PST by parksstp (Articulate Conservatives look for Converts. RINO's look for Democrat Heretics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

In some way, shape or form, Gingrich and Santorum need to join forces.


10 posted on 01/13/2012 8:40:23 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Shaking My Head on a daily basis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ulysse
Could GINGRICH and SANTORUM meet and talk ?

They might, but I for one will never vote for Gingrich. Period.

11 posted on 01/13/2012 8:43:10 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
If we lose Gingrich we will lose America. Look how far America has gone to a communists like nation now under King Obama. Keep this shi! up and you can wave goodbye to your lifestyle and be a slave to the State.
12 posted on 01/13/2012 8:43:42 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

It sounds like Santorum is definitely in decline. I suspected this would happen after his disappointing post-Iowa performances.

Now if only we could get the Paulies to see the light...


13 posted on 01/13/2012 8:43:52 AM PST by Cato in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

If I have to vote for the nom today it would be Newt. Newt has overall has had higher numbers than Perry or Santorum who have been mostly battling for third.
The one time Newt has had lower numbers have mostly been a result of Romney/Paul smear job. Otherwise, Newts numbers would have been more consistent and higher.


14 posted on 01/13/2012 8:43:58 AM PST by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

time for Rick to drop out and endorse newt

Newt/Rick 2012!


15 posted on 01/13/2012 8:44:22 AM PST by Skeez (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ulysse

Maybe Santorum would be willing to be Gingrich’s veep, with Gingrich promising Perry, Cain, and Palin each a prominent place in his cabinet. And even Ron Paul would get a promise to be made D.C.’s dogcatcher. (Pet isolationism, anybody?)


16 posted on 01/13/2012 8:44:25 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/sc/south_carolina_republican_presidential_primary-1590.html


17 posted on 01/13/2012 8:44:37 AM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Yes Independents can vote in the SC primary so I was thinking Rasmussen should have had some indenpendents in that poll.


18 posted on 01/13/2012 8:46:59 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

What is Perry’s number? Rasmussen doesn’t even list Perry. Yet if you add the numbers up, there are 19% unaccounted for. I’m sure most are undecided, but Perry must be getting some support.


19 posted on 01/13/2012 8:46:59 AM PST by nhwingut (Sarah Palin 12... No One Else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

Unwanted AND unelectable.

Two very bad traits going into the general election.

But, hey — this is how the GOP and their various minions seems to want it. This is how various VOTERS seem to want it.

Perhaps we’re just going to have to sit back and watch as the country self implodes, and hopefully be here to pick up the pieces later on.

If we’re still here. If we’re not all in jail, detained, taxed to death, taken over, or otherwise.


20 posted on 01/13/2012 8:48:38 AM PST by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson