[sick1]

It’s a good letter but again - I do not see a reference to where the SCoM ‘admitted’ that they were not empoered to enforce the judgement.

How does the system work when the Executive decides when the judiciary is acting outside of the constitution? Will you be happy when the opposing party makes such decisions?

I just don’t see how the system works.

[EternalVigilance]

The Executive is required to take an oath to support the Constitution, not the opinions of judges.

It's not really very complicated.

"Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths?"

-- George Washington