[Lucky9teen]

"The government cannot create that identity infrastructure," Dempsey said. "If it tried to, it wouldn't be trusted."

Ha....YA THINK?????

Get a load of this BS. But don't worry, it's not about a national ID card or a government-controlled system....no....no...it's just for your SECURITY and PROTECTION. Don't worry. Big Brother is out there making sure he's protecting you from all the big bad boogie men on the Internets.

Never mind we have to have an internet I.D. but NOT to vote! .....G.D. A-HOLES!!!

[Mariner]

If you all would spend some time learning about this you wouldn't be too worried.

X.500 has been around for a very long time. What has been missing is a trusted registration authority...for those who CHOOSE TO PARTICIPATE.

If a Digital Certificate and it's associated registration were mandatory to access and use the internet, I would be worried. However, neither is the case.

[upchuck]

Schmidt stresses that anonymity will remain on the Internet, saying there's no chance that "a centralized database will emerge."

Hilarious! Bullsh1t! Dream on!

[Recovering_Democrat]

Hussein hates the Fourth Amendment!

And all the others.

[ssaftler]

If I have a choice, it will be:

“NUNUVYAFUKKIN@BUSINESS.GOV“

[Colonel_Flagg]

Schmidt stresses that anonymity will remain on the Internet, saying there's no chance that "a centralized database will emerge."

Whatever.

[OldNavyVet]

Death chambers for those that won't cooperate?

Don't count it out.

[Logical me]

Welcome to communists America. We have lost freedom and the cage is getting smaller and smaller. Soon citizens will be only allowed so much oxygen per day.

[Hoodat]

So if I don’t have an Internet ID, does that mean I can’t use the internet?

[traviskicks]

libertarian ping

[Lady Lucky]

And we WILL accept it. We have accepted income tax, driver licensing, Social Security, gun laws, obamacare, airport feelups, and 50 million dead babies; we can accept anything.

[Grunthor]

Hand or forehead?

[SueRae]

FUBO is right. All the fuss, lawsuits and Justice Dept. rantings about a voter ID but they can “deem” this necessary. Hypocrisy to the max.

[theDentist]

Mine: FYBO_ESBO_GFYBO

[apoliticalone]

The government wants to know what we each say and think. Apparently tying it to our IP doesn’t actually prove identity. Now they want an individual pin and ID, and I thought Bush was bad in this regard. He’s a libertarian compared to this fascist Obama.

Since the abject failure of our USA govt. to protect us on 9-11 from 19 with box cutters, instead the blame and risk has been foisted upon each and every American as potential terrorists. It is an outrage how we are being manipulated and our rights trashed.

The new internet trend has been to require internet comments and users to register with Facebook, so that your every comment is tagged to your real name and Obama’s best friend Mark Zuckerberg profits even more. Since we must publicly post our political beliefs will we still have the right to secret ballot? Doubtful! The politicians have control of the voting machines so it doesn’t make any difference.

[Doogle]

...but but but..they don’t want VOTER ID....HA! ..these clowns are beyond STOOOPID!

[newzjunkey]

What we are talking about is enhancing online security and privacy, and reducing and perhaps even eliminating the need to memorize a dozen passwords, through creation and use of more trusted digital identities," Commerce Secretary Gary Locke said at an event Friday at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, according to CNET.com.

Clearly Secretary Locke hasn't any comprehension of computing and computer science. He must think it's like Hollywood films and TV.

[dragnet2]

The government wants total complete control.

We have been led way down the path.

[LimitedPowers]

According to my watch, this is 2012. Both the Fox and CNet websites list this story as being from January 2011.

[Bobalu]

Here’s my new internet ID

SHUTUR3.14159HOLE0-ESAD

[cva66snipe]

Watch for the GOP faithful to Big Brother is Master in congress say “I’ll Help”.