You've already seen the numbers for more-than-monthly-but-less-than-weekly pot smoking - and been given a link to the methodology. Yet you continue to state your discredited opinion as fact.
and from reading this study, they are basing things off of the honesty of the respondent.
So you're suggesting that the subjects who showed no lung damage were only claiming to be once-a-week pot smokers when they really didn't smoke at all? Because that's the only dishonesty that could bias the results toward understating the harm of pot.
I am curious why you are here at a Conservative site pushing for legalization of Pot based on some unnecessary study a Commie Pinko HHS employee decided to waste taxpayers dollars on? Feel free to keep toking on a Bong if you want. I have no interest in legalizing this.