Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WilliamIII; All
Found an interesting, and very valid, Opinion from the Supreme Court at The Environmental Protection Agency U-n-c-o-n-s-t-i-t-u-t-i-o-n-a-l by Sheriff Richard Mack.

US Supreme Court Justice Scalia wrote the following commentary in his delivered Opinion for the case Printz v. United States (95-1478), 521 U.S. 898 (1997)

We do need a federal EPA to coordinate the various State EPA's, but that could be accomplished with ten percent of the middle/upper management and 33 percent of the bureaucrats - terminate the rest.

Looks as if this is going to be another slap-down for the EPA and the greenazis infesting it!

27 posted on 01/11/2012 1:21:54 AM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: brityank
We do need a federal EPA to coordinate the various State EPA's,

If so, why not just fold those functions back into Interior and close EPA down ?

29 posted on 01/11/2012 3:18:45 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson