Perhaps it is better to say that many of the anarchist radicals all for Ron Paul are only ‘conservative’ when it comes to their libertarian immoral lifestyles. An absolute libertarianism is an impossible political/religious position in a broken down, immoral world full of vices. Many of the reasons why we do indeed have a huge government these days is precisely because so many people have abused their liberties which the American Constitution originally gave them.
Anything “absolute” is impossible. Let’s talk about facts, not rumors or abstract categories: which of Ron Paul’s values or policies come in conflict with classic conservatism? Please leave “moonbat”, “braindead dopers” and the like comments for the juveniles, let’s play adults here.
There were probably as many opium addicts in the late 1800s as there are drug addicts today. The world has always been immoral and full of vices; we have a big government because we abandoned the Constitution, not because there is more vice now.
FLASH FLASH FLASH... Our Constitution grants us NOTHING AT ALL. Our RIGHTS come from God. The Constitution is a LIMITATION ON GOVERNMENT. If you think otherwise, it’s only because you’ve never bothered to read the Founding Fathers’ writings on the meaning behind the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Get a clue!
The Constitution does not "give" anyone liberties. It enumerates natural God-given liberties. Thanks for giving us a glimpse into the anti-Paul mindset.