Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Berlin_Freeper

The economy was booming in the 1990s, which of course drove up government revenue. The stock market bubble also contributed billions to the tax revenue.

This allowed us to have tax cuts AND spending increases (remember, spending increases in a time with no war, and with very little need for welfare or stimulus spending since unemployment was low). We got a “balanced budget”, but it was short-lived because it didn’t come from serious spending restraint.

Once we had attacks on us, we had to ramp up defense spending. Once the stock market bubble burst, revenues dropped. When we went into a recession, government spending shot back up, and the deficit was back.

The balanced budget also has many fathers, because it was “good”. Hell, some even claim Clinton’s tax increases were the deciding factor. The idea that we take a single man, and cloak him with all of the good that happened while he happened to be around is absurd of course, as if being in the room conveys full responsibility.

I won’t try to minimize his contributions, if people will wake up from their selective amnesia and remember what we all knew about Gingrich 7 months ago.


1,792 posted on 01/09/2012 10:33:07 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1790 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
Second time you posted "what we all know."

You should take a look at this:

Poll: Newt, Perry or Santorum

Gingrich is by far is the conservative FR favorite.

1,793 posted on 01/09/2012 12:12:19 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1792 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson