Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mase

Simple. Unlike the purists, they want a win by choosing the most electable candidate. That would not be Santorum, Newt or Huntsman. It’s the charisma, stupid. Nothing personal intended.


76 posted on 01/06/2012 8:44:30 AM PST by adc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: adc

Mitt Romney = Obama without the tan.


98 posted on 01/06/2012 9:27:54 AM PST by Grunthor (Mitt better than Obama? Give me three examples.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: adc
Unlike the purists, they want a win by choosing the most electable candidate. That would not be Santorum, Newt or Huntsman. It’s the charisma, stupid.

Huh? Romney has charisma? Is that what they call it these days? I normally use terms like unprincipled, dishonest, and snake oil salesman, when describing Romney.

It's comical listening to the same people who told us McCain was the most "electable candidate" in 2008 now tell us that Romney is the most electable candidate in 2012. How many times do you need to be kicked in the groin before you learn your lesson?

109 posted on 01/06/2012 9:40:50 AM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson