[John D]

So...having principles and sticking to them makes Paul a loser and “un-electable”...?

The principles Cut and Run have do. Why would any sane American want to elect an anti-American who blames every problem in the world on America, endorses Cynthia McKinney for president, wants to experiment with perverts in the military, acquires more earmarks than any candidate running, wants to legalize hard core drugs and prostitution, demands under aged girls be allowed to cross state lines in order to receive abortions when they are illegal in the state she lives. A candidate whose foreign policy is appease, appease, and appease some more. Then when appeasement fails just surrender.
Yes the principles the surrender monkey holds makes him a loser and unelectable.

[incindiary]

I don't have time right now to go through your post chock-full of lies/spin/distortions, but I just want to ask you one simple question. Well, two actually. First question: Does "America" to you mean the policies of a particular administration, yes or no?

Second question. If a government does things that are either unlawful, or immoral, or unwise or subversive... is it patriotic to accept those things with our mouths shut, and keep cheering them on? Or is it patriotic to point out when our government goes against the constitution they are sworn to uphold, and the principles this country is supposed to stand for?

If you answered "No" to the first question, America does NOT mean the current policies or actions by a particular administration, then please stop lying, because it is not "anti-American" to want honesty and accountability in our leaders. Only a fool, or brainwashed dupe would think something like that. In this example, those who are anti-American would be those within our government who do things that are unlawful, immoral and subversive.