Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txhurl

Agreed, Perry refused to pander, he stood on principle.

Newt,Mitt, Santorum, not so much. They perfectly willing to endorse Big Government subsidies, hardly a conservative position.


38 posted on 01/05/2012 3:50:50 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: smoothsailing
Perry refused to pander, he stood on principle.

One of many reasons to vote for him.

44 posted on 01/05/2012 4:08:44 PM PST by World'sGoneInsane (We Can Take OUR Country Back--Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing
"Agreed, Perry refused to pander, he stood on principle.

Newt,Mitt, Santorum, not so much. They perfectly willing to endorse Big Government subsidies, hardly a conservative position."

Yep. You saw this, didn't you?

2012 Iowa Voter Caucus Guide

I don't reckon they liked Perry wanting to do away with subsidies...

53 posted on 01/05/2012 4:24:36 PM PST by Chasaway (Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

Newt’s conservative credentials are solid.


83 posted on 01/05/2012 6:11:37 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson