To: txhurl
Agreed, Perry refused to pander, he stood on principle.
Newt,Mitt, Santorum, not so much. They perfectly willing to endorse Big Government subsidies, hardly a conservative position.
To: smoothsailing
Perry refused to pander, he stood on principle. One of many reasons to vote for him.
44 posted on
01/05/2012 4:08:44 PM PST by
World'sGoneInsane
(We Can Take OUR Country Back--Perry 2012)
To: smoothsailing
"Agreed, Perry refused to pander, he stood on principle. Newt,Mitt, Santorum, not so much. They perfectly willing to endorse Big Government subsidies, hardly a conservative position."
Yep. You saw this, didn't you?
2012 Iowa Voter Caucus Guide
I don't reckon they liked Perry wanting to do away with subsidies...
53 posted on
01/05/2012 4:24:36 PM PST by
Chasaway
(Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?)
To: smoothsailing
Newt’s conservative credentials are solid.
83 posted on
01/05/2012 6:11:37 PM PST by
BuckeyeTexan
(Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson