-—”A Progressive Republican is more dangerous than a Progressive Democrat in the Presidency.”
So you’re saying a 50% bad candidate is worse than a 100% evil thug? Please explain yourself as I don’t find this logical.
So you're saying Romney is a 50% conservative? The man has a record confirming that he is FOR: government-controlled health care, onerous regulation on individuals and industry to "save the planet" in the name of global warming, activist judges, the gay "rights" agenda, cheap and easy tax-payer-funded abortions, and using government to "solve" any and every kind of problem.
Personally, I think a REPUBLICAN who advances all that crap is more dangerous than a Democrat who advances all that crap; the only thing WORSE about the whole situation is that God only knows how many conservatives, in the biggest coup liberalism and statism has ever taken on Americans, are on the verge of voting FOR all the things they stand against.
Your thinking that Romney is a "50% candidate" is bad logic.