Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lancey Howard

If the lawyer were to mention nullification to the jury the judge would immediately slap him down and strike the statement from the record. Judges do not want you to know about jury nullification.


14 posted on 01/03/2012 4:38:22 PM PST by ConservativeTeen (Proud Right Wing Extremist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeTeen

“If the lawyer were to mention nullification to the jury the judge would immediately slap him down and strike the statement from the record. Judges do not want you to know about jury nullification.”

The lawyer would be better off challenging it on Second Amendment grounds. Glen Reynolds (Instapundit) believes there is a good chance that the NYC law could be overturned as an infringement of the right to bear arms. (Paper on it: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1909617.)

Worth a try.


23 posted on 01/03/2012 5:07:48 PM PST by No Truce With Kings (Ten years on FreeRepublic and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeTeen
If the lawyer were to mention nullification to the jury the judge would immediately slap him down and strike the statement from the record. Judges do not want you to know about jury nullification.

Agreed, most judges do not want the notion even raised. But if the lawyer can cleverly sneak the idea through to the jury, the judge can "strike it from the record" all he wants but the jury won't unhear it. The lawyer then needs to be sure to slip the idea in again at closing arguments. "Ooops...! Sorry judgie."

33 posted on 01/03/2012 5:54:47 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson