Video at source.

..politicians liars....sheeesh what’s next

Ummm...so is Gingrich. All politicians are liars.

Finally someone is calling out ~~Weirdo~~ Willard Romney on his many duplicities. The man is a stranger to the truth, and an enemy of all things conservative.

Go Newt!

There was a very good reason that every Republican in the race last time hated Romney's filthy rotten liberal guts!

Gingrich just found out why in the past couple weeks.

What did you all expect?...A Harvard Law or Business grad, by definition, is required to be the best liar on the planet. Mit is not just a liar, he has “the gift” that Obama so proudly claimed to own.

If I was paying someone to sell a crap sandwich to the American people..I'd hire a Harvard grad.Had enough yet America?

To his credit, Gingrich didn't throw the first punch campaigning in Iowa and chose to follow a higher ground against fellow Republicans.

It's interesting that Romney didn't either, but had others do it for him.

Now we get to see who can throw the last punch. Gingrich didn't start the fight, let's see if he can finish it.

Should be good prep for the main event with obama.

Gingrich’s descent from leading candidate to a gutter backbencher continues. With this type of junk, he is not giving any option to us Perry supporters if the event Perry loses steam after Iowa. This dirt bag spent the last one week of campaigning just whining to no end and calling names. Does he have anything positive to say anymore about why someone should take a look at him if the field whittles down?

Excellent answers from Newt. Thanks for posting. Newt nails it!

Well Newt sure didn’t pull any punch’s!!!!

No more Mr. Nice!!

Newt is not my first choice but he is my second choice. I really resent his being run out of the race (somewhat) by Romney’s money and Romney’s lies. (Romney —I can’t control my PAC guy)

But I am disappointed in Newt’s ability to fight back successfully.

That was what we were all banking on with Newt ... that he could outtalk and out manuever Obama.

So, now it’s making him look weak that he can’t out talk Romney.

He’s just now started fighting back but not lookin’ that good doing it. Calling Mitt Romney a liar is not gonna do it. We all know that anyway.

Get your game on, Newt.

Hey Newt, here’s another angle of attack on Romney.

There’s all this uproar around the country, in particular within the conservative movement, about the government picking winners and losers, and how the govt. should get out of that business.

Newt needs to remind the public that Romney’s company Bain capital is in the business of picking winners and losers. Do we really want him bringing that arrogant mentality to the White House?

NOPE!

he needs to quit whining....if he is crying this hard now what will he do when obama drops a billion on him...toughen up dude

"""""Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, whose support in Iowa has withered""""??????

ROFL: 41% STILL UNDECIDED????

GoooooooooooNEWT.

The truth about liberal Romney in his own words:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7OQoBxZZPqU

SSDD

MORE MYTHS from MYTH ROMNEY

"Mitt Romney Lies About Father ‘Marching With Martin Luther King, Jr.’"
"Mitt Romney has been caught in yet another lie.
Only yesterday Romney’s claim of not supporting Planned Parenthood abortion mills was abruptly smashed by a photograph surfacing of him at one of their fundraisers in 1994.
Today, it’s Romney’s claim that his father “marched with” famed civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr.
During his “I’m a Mormon but it doesn’t matter” speech, Mitt Romney claimed he saw his father,
George Romney, marching with MLK during a 1968 civil rights march through Grosse Pointe, Michigan.
It was a stirring account of the efforts of his father to show that the Romney family have always reached across ecumenical lines.
Only one little problem… it never happened."

"Mitt Romney went a step further in a 1978 interview with the Boston Herald.
Talking about the Mormon Church and racial discrimination, he said:
"My father and I marched with Martin Luther King Jr. through the streets of Detroit."
"Yesterday (12/20/07), Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom acknowledged that was not true.
"Mitt Romney did not march with Martin Luther King,"
he said in an e-mail statement to the Globe.

Against Myth Romney is 1:

"On Sunday, June 23, 1963, 125,000 people marched down Detroit's Woodward Avenue
to the Civic Center, in what was described at the time as the largest civil-rights demonstration in the nation's history.
According to the next day's account in the Holland Evening Sentinel,
the crowd at the Center "lustily booed," when representatives of Governor George W. Romney
read a proclamation declaring "Freedom March Day in Michigan." But Martin Luther King Jr. didn't fault Romney for his absence,
which the governor ascribed to his policy against public appearances on the Sabbath.
"At a news conference following the march . .
[King] refused to criticize Romney for not attending the demonstration," the Sentinel reported."

Against Myth Romney is 2:

Susan Englander, assistant editor of the Martin Luther King Jr. Papers Project at Stanford University, who is editing the King papers from that era,
says Myth Romney was untruthful, when she told the Globe yesterday:
"I researched this question, and indeed it is untrue that George Romney marched with [Dr.] King."

Against Myth Romney is 3:

"King never marched in Grosse Pointe, according to the Grosse Pointe Historical Society,
and had not appeared in the town at all at the time the Broder book was published.
“I’m quite certain of that,” says Suzy Berschback, curator of the Grosse Pointe Historical Society"

Mitt Romney is a liar.

Yes, we know. I had to LOL when I saw this. Love it! Go Newt!

I’ve heard others say that Romney is a sneak and that he was the one behind the Cain meltdown.

whats the over/under to make book now ???

i figure thats at least another field goal shaved from ole greengrinches campaign...

added that he would still vote for him if Romney won the GOP nomination.

so the 'lies' are worth noting for the record, but arent enuff to discourage his vote ??? sounds like the nooter is claiming that we have nothing to fear with willard, and that he would'make a fine president' indeed...

i think the point shaving is a tradeoff for a cabinet/insider position...