You certainly agree with the Democrat/MSM propaganda.
They said Reagan stood no chance against Carter in 1980.
They said Reagan was alienating the neutral nations in the 1980’s and that Communism was the wave of the future and that America was isolated and unpopular.
They said McCain was the best nominee because he would appeal to moderates and independents.
They said the Tea Party and other conservatives were extremists who would alienate moderates and independents and cause the Republicans to lose big in 2010.
I have heard all the arguments before. They say a principled conservative can never get the votes of moderates and independents. An outsider who is not endorsed by the MSM can never win.
I don't believe it.
Obama isn’t Carter and Santorum sure as hell isn’t Ronald Reagan. You go on disbelieving though.
As the late compromising Ev Dirksen shook his finger at Tom Dewey in 1952 and said: “You led us down the path to defeat before, why should we follow you again.” (not exact words). For some reason though, the sheeple keep doing as it is told.
Reagan had strong political support and money. Santorum doesn’t. That said I like him better than Newt. He shows some self restraint and is a solid conservative. I don’t see Santorum on a couch with Nancy P. laughing about ruining the US economy for the sake of liberal non-science.
They said Reagan stood no chance against Carter in 1980.
THATS RIGHT no pun intended