Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void

Sooo,
If a republican wins this go around does that mean the president can incarcerate Andrea itchell and hold her sorry liberal ass indefinately without trial?
Boy that would go over well.


109 posted on 01/03/2012 4:45:44 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) You'd be mad as hell to if you were married to that wookie bitch little fag that he is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Boucher

The couldnt really do that because of what i said above:

the govt would have to prove that this bill applies to them in a court of law first-esp since the bill was intended to apply only to someone who either was a member or provided support to Al Qaeda, Taliban or an affiliated Terror outfit or had a direct role in 9/11. Then they would have to come to a sort of consensus on whether or not existing law allows for their detainment-since again, this bill states that the laws regarding detaining US citizens and legal aliens are the same as they were before. And whether or not existing law and our current state of conflict allow for detention and suspension of Habeus Corpus is highly debated, thus clearly contestable in a court of law. So in a way, they would get due process-if the govt was still interested in playing by the rules and following the laws. If they werent, then NDAA 2012 would be wholly irrelevant anyway,


115 posted on 01/03/2012 8:33:41 AM PST by emax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson