Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Islander2

Whether or not Newt fights back is not the issue for me.

His precipitous fall from the polls can be traced almost exactly to the release of the video of him supporting an individual mandate aka Romneycare aka Obamacare.

The only thing he had going for him was that he was going to be an alternative to Mittens and his Progressivism.

After watching that video, I was so disgusted that I wanted to vomit.

Basically our choices at this point are:

1.) Mittens (RINO)
2.) Gingrich (RINO)
3.) Paul (NUTTY BAR)

That is unless Santorum can keep it up. I’d gladly pick him vs. these other three boobs.


26 posted on 12/30/2011 9:23:21 PM PST by adm5 (AMERICA HAS ONLY GOD AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT LEFT TO SAVE THE REPUBLIC. by: LibLieSlayer 3/18/10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: adm5

(The only thing he had going for him was that he was going to be an alternative to Mittens and his Progressivism.)

That is all you think Newt brings to the debate? Very shallow analysis on your part me thinks. Of course you took in to consideration his time in the House and the Contract With America.....sure you did and did not find those accomplishments worthy of anything.
To win this battle with the Repub. Establishment on our side and 0bummer on the other side we will need a candidate with a backbone and balls and one who will fight back when attacked (not like McCain or Bush). It is my opinion that Newt is the right one. I do like Backman and Santorum, but still think Newt fights better.


31 posted on 12/30/2011 9:34:15 PM PST by Islander2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson