Posted on 12/30/2011 7:36:21 PM PST by TBBT
.
Well said!!!
Well, Newt mentioned that Romney made money by bankrupting companies at Bain Capital and got bashed by the beltway media. He has called Romney a Massachusetts moderate. He pointed out in the one debate that Romney lost to Kennedy and therefore couldn’t become a career politician. He said he couldn’t vote for Ron Paul.
So he’s done some criticizing of the other candidates. I guess this is about him not doing it in actual produced TV ads? One problem is most of the criticism of Romney would be centered around Bain Capital, therefore it might not play well to all of the Republican base, e.g. tugging the heartstrings with interviews with laid-off workers. I’m also not sure how a negative ad calling someone a heartless tycoon or whatever counters an ad where they call you a socialist or whatever. It’s not a defense so both candidates come out dirty.
I mostly wouldn’t do negative ads, I would do contrast ads. I would put Newt’s experience, achievements and ideas up on the screen and compare it to Romney’s weaker offerings. I do think they need to do flip-flop ads like are on YouTube. Unfortunately the Wall Street tycoon ads that will really kill Romney just can’t play in the Republican primary without backfiring. So people will remain ignorant of how vulnerable he is.
FYI, JimRob has some thoughts on Gingrich in his post #13 on this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2825718/posts
.
It’s because she’s charmed the electorate about as much as she charmed all those guys in high school who didn’t ask her to the prom.
I would love to see Newt set fire to Romney’s fancy pants during a debate. Just rip him a new one. I don’t recall seeing anyone do that yet.
Amazing...
If he handles it properly, not only will he not need to go to the same negative levels as his opponents, but he can essentially make it backfire on them.
Don’t get me wrong,if Newt is the nominee-I will vote for him.It’s a shame but I can’t respect his weak moral character.
“Not to him and Nancy all comfy on the couch. You didnt make a rebuttal. You made a generic statement and called me invincible and ignorant. Thats not a rebuttal. Thats an insult.”
I did not call you invincible. I recognized that willfully ignoring facts results in invincible ignorance. Also, if a thing is true it is no insult.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.