Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As Gingrich Reels From Attack Ads, Some Aides Suggest Fighting Back
nytimes.com ^ | 12/30/2011 | TRIP GABRIEL

Posted on 12/30/2011 7:36:21 PM PST by TBBT

DES MOINES — Alarmed by Newt Gingrich’s decline in the polls in the face of a fusillade of negative advertisements, some senior aides and grass-roots supporters have suggested that he reverse course and fight fire with fire, fearing for the future of his candidacy if he does not.

Mr. Gingrich’s vow to stay positive draws applause at every stop of his winding Iowa bus tour, but polls raise questions about that strategy as attack ads against him from his opponents’ campaigns and independent groups have seeped into voters’ minds.

New polls of Iowa Republicans this week suggest that Mr. Gingrich has lost more than half his support, as he has fallen from the top of the field to a statistical tie with candidates he once was far ahead of, like former Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and Gov. Rick Perry of Texas.

“How long can you take the beating before hitting back?” said Josh Byrnes, a state representative and the chairman of Mr. Gingrich’s campaign for Mitchell County, who added that he was “blown away” by how much damage the attack ads had done.

“Maybe someday you’ll look back and say, ‘Boy, he should have pulled the gloves off,’ ” Mr. Byrnes said.

Among the campaign’s senior staff, “there’s a small chorus of folks who have been urging him to respond in kind” to the blistering barrage on the airwaves, a top aide said.

Instead of the gauzy “Morning in America”-type ads that Mr. Gingrich prefers, some advisers discussed whether the campaign should run the kind of attack that the Democratic National Committee created last month aimed at Mitt Romney’s shifting stances, accusing him of being “two men trapped in one body.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; because; causeiowadontmatter; gingrich; iowadoesntmatter; iowaisirrelevant; iowasoesntmatter; newt; newtgingrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Farmer Dean
Agreed,but Newt has so much bad baggage that he’s an easy target.

.

41 posted on 12/30/2011 10:23:18 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Well said!!!


42 posted on 12/30/2011 10:43:02 PM PST by Islander2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Well, Newt mentioned that Romney made money by bankrupting companies at Bain Capital and got bashed by the beltway media. He has called Romney a Massachusetts moderate. He pointed out in the one debate that Romney lost to Kennedy and therefore couldn’t become a career politician. He said he couldn’t vote for Ron Paul.

So he’s done some criticizing of the other candidates. I guess this is about him not doing it in actual produced TV ads? One problem is most of the criticism of Romney would be centered around Bain Capital, therefore it might not play well to all of the Republican base, e.g. tugging the heartstrings with interviews with laid-off workers. I’m also not sure how a negative ad calling someone a heartless tycoon or whatever counters an ad where they call you a socialist or whatever. It’s not a defense so both candidates come out dirty.

I mostly wouldn’t do negative ads, I would do contrast ads. I would put Newt’s experience, achievements and ideas up on the screen and compare it to Romney’s weaker offerings. I do think they need to do flip-flop ads like are on YouTube. Unfortunately the Wall Street tycoon ads that will really kill Romney just can’t play in the Republican primary without backfiring. So people will remain ignorant of how vulnerable he is.


43 posted on 12/30/2011 10:50:50 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner; Psalm 144; Jim Robinson; All
Not to him and Nancy all comfy on the couch. You didn’t make a rebuttal. You made a generic statement and called me invincible and ignorant. That’s not a rebuttal. That’s an insult. I provide facts with evidence. You provide insults.

FYI, JimRob has some thoughts on Gingrich in his post #13 on this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2825718/posts

.

44 posted on 12/30/2011 10:52:13 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

It’s because she’s charmed the electorate about as much as she charmed all those guys in high school who didn’t ask her to the prom.


45 posted on 12/30/2011 10:53:01 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

46 posted on 12/30/2011 11:08:05 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

I would love to see Newt set fire to Romney’s fancy pants during a debate. Just rip him a new one. I don’t recall seeing anyone do that yet.


47 posted on 12/31/2011 12:02:01 AM PST by catbertz (Easter egg...I wants it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
Sure, man can pollute the rivers, streams, and the air. But not to the point where he can disrupt the work of the lord almighty.

Amazing...

48 posted on 12/31/2011 12:37:38 AM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
Newt may be taking the right track for now. He is smart enough to be able to toss out some bombs and the other candidates might actually miss the message for a bit before becoming flustered. Not likely they can do the same. I hear he is preparing to fight back and I hope it's on an itellectual level that clearly separates him from the street-smart, IQ dumb folks like Mitt. He can make himself look smart while making them show the feral natures they possess.

If he handles it properly, not only will he not need to go to the same negative levels as his opponents, but he can essentially make it backfire on them.

49 posted on 12/31/2011 4:22:05 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Don’t get me wrong,if Newt is the nominee-I will vote for him.It’s a shame but I can’t respect his weak moral character.


50 posted on 12/31/2011 8:37:30 AM PST by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

“Not to him and Nancy all comfy on the couch. You didn’t make a rebuttal. You made a generic statement and called me invincible and ignorant. That’s not a rebuttal. That’s an insult.”

I did not call you invincible. I recognized that willfully ignoring facts results in invincible ignorance. Also, if a thing is true it is no insult.


51 posted on 12/31/2011 1:21:56 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson