Posted on 12/29/2011 4:20:48 PM PST by mnehring
You are right, Paul voted to continue aid to Palestine.
http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=111957
One of the many reasons he is “Fraud Paul”
You are correct it is tasteless, boarding on disgusting yet not nearly as disgusting as the left and some on the right trumpeting a mosque on 9/11 land. And of course a diatribe by Paul against America and people who are opposed to the joint.
http://www.ronpaul.com/2010-08-20/ron-paul-sunshine-patriots-stop-your-demagogy-about-the-nyc-mosque/
So SJ, lighter versus anti-American rant = hum what do yo think is more egregious.
Both are tasteless, but only one gets the prize, namley the one found here where conservatives can amicably discuss their differences with facts and informed opinion.
Thanks
I am intrigued that you state both are horrible/egregious yet it is a picture over an anti-American rant by a sitting Congressman running for President of the USA you find less so.
As they say “to each his own”.
Because it resulted in several attacks on our interests, and at least two wars in response. Any idea how much those cost?
I've got some folks in the ghetto I'd like to patrol. Don't want them causing any trouble. Care to chip in a few cents for my bazooka? I promise, I'll just walk around in the alley and let them know I'm there to make sure they behave themselves. And - - BONUS - - - You'll feel safer! And then, should I get shot at and shoot my bazooka here and there in self-defense, please book a first class flight and come personally to my defense. No big deal. Right?
The notion of building a mosque on 9/11 turf is what I find tasteless. If you want to post the picture in your video of choice up here, I’ll let you know which of the two images wins the prize. There’s always room to improve in that respect, and I’m sure you’d make a worthy contestant.
You maybe trying to be cryptic, if that’s the case then you win because I honestly am not getting your analogy.
Sorry I thought you were saying the picture was worse than the anti-American rant.
Also, read the “anti-American Rant” and did not find anything anti-American. Property rights are a solidly American concept, along with the idea that we do not deny those rights because we do not hold the same faith as the one who would own property. I would prefer that St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church be permitted to rebuild its sanctuary first. In my opinion it is utterly distasteful to build a mosque at, or near, the 9/11 site.
It is not anti-American to welcome people of all faiths, provided they work within our Constitutional framework. Certain Muslims cannot handle that. They should not be here, nor should they think they can get away with forcing a change in our founding principles. The ones who scheme that change, whether on our turf or over there, ought to be promptly, and quietly, dispatched.
You see little problem with donating a little bit to foreign entities so they can defend themselves. I am asking you to send me a little change, too, so I can do the same thing in my town. Just a very small percentage. Be advised, however, that if I must use the goods you’ve purchased in part on my behalf, you will also be required to invest much more. Maybe even spill a little blood.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.